With the Linux Vendor Firmware Service serving more than 135 million downloads for Linux users updating their system and device firmware, LVFS has been working to get more hardware vendors to contribute either engineering resources or directly contributing annual dues as sponsors. Framework Computer is now the first one to have executed an agreement under these new sponsorship efforts.

Red Hat in employing lead developer Richard Hughes has contributed the most to LVFS/Fwupd’s success, the Linux Foundation has also hosted the project since it has shifted into their umbrella, AMD’s Mario Limonciello is among the significant contributors, and now Framework Computer is a new sponsor to the project.

  • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cool, but I don’t care how big Framework makes their tent. They will not see a cent from me.

    • surfrock66@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Purity testing everything you use means you have to get off Lemmy, if you look at the statements from some of the core devs. It is no way to live and is pretty much incompatible with being on the internet. Framework is clearly doing more good than harm, and while no company is perfect or immune from critique, feedback from customers does more than knee-jerk comments from people with no stakes.

      • kaidenshi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not a purity test, it’s boycotting an admitted Nazi friendly organization. When Framework chose to embrace, financially support, and then when called out on it, specifically state that the Nazis are welcome in their big tent, that tent became a Nazi tent. That’s not a tent me or many others want to be in, because that makes the Nazis feel welcome and free to attack anyone else in the tent with no repercussions and with the full, spoken support of Framework.

        Fuck that, and fuck you if you don’t like it.

        • surfrock66@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Counterpoint. This line of thinking is what got me living under an ACTUAL fascist regime right now. People did purity testing with Harris on whatever issue, pick your poison (Gaza, police accountability, etc) and it moved the needle. How much will never be known, but a chunk of people spent so much time listening to talking heads and streamers that they decided to not vote for her. And now we have Trump, destabilizing the world, letting a guy with brain worms decide everyone’s health. Harris would have been the best option by far even if she was not perfect, but fixing good was always a better option than rejecting not-perfect. If framework goes away, good luck getting another right-to-repair first org to build hardware. There has never been a better time to make the point “stop purity testing things, acknowledge when things are the better option, and work to make them even better.” All this “us vs. them” and using language that paints anything as black or white moves the needle on people passively reading comments, and does actual harm. Living in a world without a grey area does actual harm.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I phone banked for Harris but she was making our jobs harder by taking unpopular positions. What will you have me say to the voter who won’t vote for a Newsom presidency because they take AIPAC money? Because I was told to just move on and call the next person.

            • surfrock66@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              You tell them to plug their nose and swallow the medicine because the consequences of not choosing the better of 2 options in a 2 party system is loss of life and rights for innumerable people all over the world.

              • zbyte64@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 day ago

                I don’t think I have ever seen that explanation work on someone who is misinformed, but if I am proven wrong then the world will be a better place.

          • MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            America ended up in a fascist regime because liberals wanted cheaper eggs and became convinced only Donald Trump could make it happen.

            • Nalivai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Blaming liberals for everything is a nice, wholesome American activity. They seem to simultaneously be ineffective at anything, but also responsible for all the evil in the world

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                19 hours ago

                They seem to simultaneously be ineffective at anything, but also responsible for all the evil in the world

                Why does that sound so familiar? Hmm…

                OH. Uh-oh.

            • CCMan1701A@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Yeah, my neighbor’s believed in this a lot. My counter argument was always “How can you vote for hate?” Wasn’t anyone around for his first term?

      • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        No, I just don’t give them any money. If I were to procure a Framework Laptop by means of a genie wish, I would still use it. I am probably using a ton of open source software right now made by people I can’t stand. Also I can purity check and boycott whoever I like, whenever I like. I don’t have to live by your rules. You do you.

        • PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          So you’d rather buy a laptop from a vendor that gives price breaks to ICE, such as Dell and HP, or one indirectly owned by the CCP such as Lenovo? That’s certainly a choice.

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            buy used or third party refurbished. just because all the big tech companies are evil is no reason to excuse evil in small tech

          • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            one indirectly owned by the CCP such as Lenovo?

            You could say this about literally every Chinese owned company. Eliminate all Chinese and all American companies and there’s not a lot of goods left you could purchase. Even less when it comes to goods made for other companies in China by Chinese firms.

      • Corbin@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Your analogy is bogus because this is the Fediverse and we can defederate from tankies without giving them money. The entire topic revolves around how Framework spends money. Whataboutism in this context is a classic defense of fascism, for what it’s worth.

      • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        This isn’t purity testing, this is not giving money to fascist fucks who actually want to see me and my family dead.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      So you won’t buy the most user maintainable and repairable laptop, that also comes with Linux and probably worth open source firmware in the not too distant future because you don’t like the politics of the owner of an open source project the company supports?

      That really feels like cutting off your nose to spite your face

      • aichan@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, when the political stance of the supported company is “I would literally murder you of I could” the politics become kinda relevant 🥲

        • HaraVier@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Is that some hyperbole? Or is there a source to that? I’m out of the loop*, so apologies for my ignorance.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Yes, it’s hyperbole.

            Framework gave money or laptops to a bunch of different Linux projects and has generally been very active in the Linux community.

            One of the laptops they gave out went to DDH, who in addition to having a project that in reality is little more than an Arch script, also posts a lot of alt-right drivel online.

            Most famously him moaning about London being too full of immigrants - something made even more ironic given that he himself is an immigrant to the UK. Clearly he meant non-white immigrants.

            It’s unknown how much Framework knew about his unsavoury opinions, and plenty of other projects they’ve supported have been very progressive, so it doesn’t seem like they’re choosing to support only people who align with a specific political stance.

            A lot of people are frustrated with their response to the criticism - that they’re a small team that don’t want to wade into the politics of each project they donate a laptop to. Which I kind of understand, but I also understand being miffed at them for sending a laptop to a super hateful person then shrugging their shoulders and saying “look, we don’t want to be political or have to research the personal opinions of people in the community”.

            Personally I think it’s more of a fuckup and PR misstep rather than endorsing any particular world-view.

            • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              Why are their question marks at the end of your sentences? Are you posing those questions to me? Are you trying to illustrate some sort of vocal inflection? If so, then that’s even more confusing.

      • PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Just some fools on lemmy crying about the fact that they gave the creator of Hyprland a laptop and a couple grand, which is apparently enough to make Framework about as evil as US Border Patrol.