U.S. senators are probing whether Big Tech data centers are driving up local electricity bills by socializing grid upgrade costs onto residents. Some of the tactics they’re using include NDAs, shell companies, and lobbying. Ars Technica reports:

In letters (PDF) to seven AI firms, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) cited a study estimating that “electricity prices have increased by as much as 267 percent in the past five years” in “areas located near significant data center activity.” Prices increase, senators noted, when utility companies build out extra infrastructure to meet data centers’ energy demands – which can amount to one customer suddenly consuming as much power as an entire city. They also increase when demand for local power outweighs supply. In some cases, residents are blindsided by higher bills, not even realizing a data center project was approved, because tech companies seem intent on dodging backlash and frequently do not allow terms of deals to be publicly disclosed.

AI firms “ask public officials to sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) preventing them from sharing information with their constituents, operate through what appear to be shell companies to mask the real owner of the data center, and require that landowners sign NDAs as part of the land sale while telling them only that a ‘Fortune 100 company’ is planning an ‘industrial development’ seemingly in an attempt to hide the very existence of the data center,” senators wrote. States like Virginia with the highest concentration of data centers could see average electricity prices increase by another 25 percent by 2030, senators noted. But price increases aren’t limited to the states allegedly striking shady deals with tech companies and greenlighting data center projects, they said. “Interconnected and interstate power grids can lead to a data center built in one state raising costs for residents of a neighboring state,” senators reported.

Under fire for supposedly only pretending to care about keeping neighbors’ costs low were Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Equinix, Digital Realty, and CoreWeave. Senators accused firms of paying “lip service,” claiming that they would do everything in their power to avoid increasing residential electricity costs, while actively lobbying to pass billions in costs on to their neighbors. […] Particularly problematic, senators emphasized, were reports that tech firms were getting discounts on energy costs as utility companies competed for their business, while prices went up for their neighbors.

  • Manjushri@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    11 hours ago

    AI firms “ask public officials to sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) preventing them from sharing information with their constituents…

    How is this even remotely legal? Is this even remotely legal?

      • j4yc33@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The problem here is that who owns a data center isn’t a matter of breaking the law. It’s only if the data center starts breaking the law, and only then can the lawmaker share that the law is being broken and by whom. It wouldn’t give them carte blanche to go out and say “Microsoft owns that land”.

    • chocrates@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Even shithead corporations have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Under our current system at least.

      They would be within their rights to make people sign NDA’s regardless of their political position.

      Seems fucking dumb but i think that is where we are at

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Your right to privacy ends where your actions that impact the public begins.

        Allowing elected officials (allowing, not even MAKING) to sign NDAs with private companies provides cover to do shitty things and get influenced by lobbiests.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Regulate data centers already! Make it mandatory that they be self-powered by renewable energy. Problem solved.

    • ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      Not just data centers. Do that to everything. Find where to put a line; if you’re using x% of the local power you have to pay more for power. Flip that shit so massive electric consumers are paying for everyone else.

    • Bizzle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The current administration will never do this but it would be nice

    • Alaik@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That has the added benefit of helping the grid when the bubble pops.

  • BertramDitore@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The average utility bill for Pacific Gas and Electric Co. customers increased by about 67% over the last five years. (source)

    I can vouch. My PG&E bills in 2020 averaged around $70 a month, now they’re regularly over $170. No change in my consumption habits. If I’m mathing correctly, that’s more than a 100% increase for me.

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Senators count the shady ways data centers pass energy costs on to Americans

    … Well how many have they counted?

    What’s the number?

      • tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Georgia still has among the lowest per-kWh tariffs in the country, at $0.086/kWh (0.0806 in winter). Plus $14/month service charge and 20% taxes & fees. Compare California at $0.40/kWh.

        • crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Oh good, so long as the increasing utility bills stay under some arbitrarily-decided threshold, the rising costs are just fine, actually.