blacks, LGBTQ and enemies of the government

…but you repeat yourself.

They should not exist.

We’re not the ones who need to hear it, though.

He’s not a “wannabe.”

“Little Brother”, you say?

Oh no, murderous criminal thugs might become victims. How terrible.

“Congressman” is a generic term that covers people in both houses of Congress.

Third time’s the charm!

You mean Robert “Conservative Traitor” Mueller, right?

The only Mueller I remember was the one who entered the public spotlight in the first place by being nominated for SCOTUS specifically because he was so conservative that Obama figured not even Mitch McConnel could find an excuse to object to him.

That’s already what this is.

Those weren’t progressives. Those were right-wing concern trolls cosplaying as leftists.

Or Gamergate, for that matter.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/23/us/gamergate-harassment-reddit-twitter-cec

This comment deserves to be its own post.

[Microsoft are] just literal thieves.

Always have been.

(But now it’s worse because it’s the entire public, not just their competitors)

What I’m hearing is that the politicians need to be made even more scared of the rest of us.

What disgusting cope. Don’t you have any self-respect?

Just because you can work around the abuse doesn’t mean they aren’t abusing you.

Edit: people like the commenter above are actively making the world worse by normalizing and even excusing abusive corporate practices. I apologize for nothing!

Sure is a good thing Ubuntu doesn’t sometimes sneakily install a Snap when you try to use apt to install a package, such as with Firefox. Tricking users into using Snap without realizing it, making them unknowingly vulnerable to exploits like this, would be really really bad and unethical on Canonical’s part.

Did Reagan threaten war with NATO?

Fuck, now I’m getting flashbacks about Net Neutrality.

You’re 100% right on the mechanics of it, but only 90% right overall. There is one small thing you might not be considering: Republicans might be more supportive of removing an “incapacitated” president than impeaching a tyrannical one because of the less damaging connotation of it.