U.S. senators are probing whether Big Tech data centers are driving up local electricity bills by socializing grid upgrade costs onto residents. Some of the tactics they’re using include NDAs, shell companies, and lobbying. Ars Technica reports:

In letters (PDF) to seven AI firms, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) cited a study estimating that “electricity prices have increased by as much as 267 percent in the past five years” in “areas located near significant data center activity.” Prices increase, senators noted, when utility companies build out extra infrastructure to meet data centers’ energy demands – which can amount to one customer suddenly consuming as much power as an entire city. They also increase when demand for local power outweighs supply. In some cases, residents are blindsided by higher bills, not even realizing a data center project was approved, because tech companies seem intent on dodging backlash and frequently do not allow terms of deals to be publicly disclosed.

AI firms “ask public officials to sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) preventing them from sharing information with their constituents, operate through what appear to be shell companies to mask the real owner of the data center, and require that landowners sign NDAs as part of the land sale while telling them only that a ‘Fortune 100 company’ is planning an ‘industrial development’ seemingly in an attempt to hide the very existence of the data center,” senators wrote. States like Virginia with the highest concentration of data centers could see average electricity prices increase by another 25 percent by 2030, senators noted. But price increases aren’t limited to the states allegedly striking shady deals with tech companies and greenlighting data center projects, they said. “Interconnected and interstate power grids can lead to a data center built in one state raising costs for residents of a neighboring state,” senators reported.

Under fire for supposedly only pretending to care about keeping neighbors’ costs low were Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Equinix, Digital Realty, and CoreWeave. Senators accused firms of paying “lip service,” claiming that they would do everything in their power to avoid increasing residential electricity costs, while actively lobbying to pass billions in costs on to their neighbors. […] Particularly problematic, senators emphasized, were reports that tech firms were getting discounts on energy costs as utility companies competed for their business, while prices went up for their neighbors.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Regulate data centers already! Make it mandatory that they be self-powered by renewable energy. Problem solved.

    • ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not just data centers. Do that to everything. Find where to put a line; if you’re using x% of the local power you have to pay more for power. Flip that shit so massive electric consumers are paying for everyone else.

      • Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The fact that industrial and commercial use pays lower rates than people trying to live their lives and heat their home is such bullshit.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          It’s logical, he who has the power makes others pay for him.

          I mean, you do realize, of course, that due to effects of scale the current situation is putting smaller pressure on industrial consumers than on home consumers.

          But all the talk about demanding to regulate - that’s not how you change anything. It’s like trying to fix a wall with an A4 sheet of printer paper. Yes, it’s something with the correct topology. No, it won’t do.

          You need to grow an industry that puts the balancing pressure. That’s what we all should be thinking about, something that grows power and feeds people, that is in its interest opposed to these things we don’t like.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s how you make American manufacturing even more prohibitively expensive than it already is.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          If there’s not enough power to run a manufacturing plant without impacting residents, then the generation needs to be expanded before anything can be built anyway.

          Luckily renewable energy is the cheapest form of new electricity to build. I see no problem with making new manufacturing plants build/pay for their own power generation as well. The cost of installation is probably a tiny fraction of the cost of the actual manufacturing equipment or GPUs if it’s an AI data center.

    • Bizzle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The current administration will never do this but it would be nice

    • Alaik@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That has the added benefit of helping the grid when the bubble pops.