While neither the regime nor SpaceX likes to reveal their cards, hackers and journalists are not deterred by this, and the laws of physics apply to everyone.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    1 day ago

    Good article. Very interesting.

    TL;DR: Starlink recievers use methods to make it so they don’t have to be directly positioned at satellites; this in turn leaves them vulnerable to “side lobe jamming” and GPS spoofing. The suggestion is to point them directly and cover them i.e. in a pit or in a cavity of some such so that the jamming / spoofing doesn’t reach it.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      It sounds like the downside here would be that you loose reliability in your connection. Probably fine for most things.

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, you lose reliability. If you put the antenna in a pit it will be limited in its beamforming capability. This restricts the number of visible satellites, leading to situations where no satellites are visible.