I’ll bite. Let’s find out what your brilliant ideas of what people should do instead are. Like, let’s pretend too that people can only do ONE thing too. I’ll give you the advantage of that if you want. What’s the thing people should do instead?
Dude. You can’t even state your actual position. I can’t read your mind. You could literally be a Nazi, an Accelerationist, or a leftist that never read a history book from what you said.
I literally gave you a chance for a conversation around your original comment. What a pathetic response.
You afraid to say the answer is “violence”? Like we could have a conversation theoretically around that. (Obviously not advocating for it).
But your criticism of non violence is the opposite position of people that historically have written about when violence is necessary. Starting from the point of criticism of non violence is a position of an uneducated idiot that would never be able to understand when violence is required. Those people, historically, are critizing the oppression that made non violence impossible.
I’m sorry your brain never fully recovered from being dropped on your head as a child.
It’s okay. Go make a sign and carry it around outside. You’ll feel like you’re helping.
I’ll bite. Let’s find out what your brilliant ideas of what people should do instead are. Like, let’s pretend too that people can only do ONE thing too. I’ll give you the advantage of that if you want. What’s the thing people should do instead?
You already know the answer to that question. Have some self respect. Play dumb if you like, but eventually you are what you pretend to be.
Dude. You can’t even state your actual position. I can’t read your mind. You could literally be a Nazi, an Accelerationist, or a leftist that never read a history book from what you said.
I literally gave you a chance for a conversation around your original comment. What a pathetic response.
You afraid to say the answer is “violence”? Like we could have a conversation theoretically around that. (Obviously not advocating for it).
But your criticism of non violence is the opposite position of people that historically have written about when violence is necessary. Starting from the point of criticism of non violence is a position of an uneducated idiot that would never be able to understand when violence is required. Those people, historically, are critizing the oppression that made non violence impossible.
What are you doing to stop this?
Your country, clown.