• skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    47 minutes ago

    And yet my LinkedIn is still full of people complaining about how much the EU over-regulates

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    25 minutes ago

    At the end of the day the makers of smartphones determine if you can mod their products to their liking or not, and in most cases they really hate it because they want to continue selling phones and make them more difficult to fix without special tools.

    How I was then doing fine with a feature phone allowing me to play music and take pictures. That was in 2009.

  • gaymer@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Gone are the days when oneplus used to be consumer friendly company. The parent company CEO is taking advice from some wannabe Elon musk. All these people who say they understand business but have no understanding of technical knowhow shouldn’t be allowed to become business leaders but the world we live in is becoming a shithole because the bootlickers are being given these top roles.

  • lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Seriously are there any Android brands that do not suck and ship everywhere (not limited to the US/EU markets)??

    • eru@mouse.chitanda.moe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      google pixel with grapheneos maybe pixel 10 is pretty repairable hardware wise, some prior ones have glued in battery

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I believe thay all have shitty operating systems. But some of them have an aftermarket OS available. Pick your OS first, then look for a phone that can run it. Here are the ones I know of:

      GrapheneOS

      CalyxOS (on hiatus)

      Crdriod

      LineageOS

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    13 hours ago

    That means they were making money by people running their os.

    If they spend the money on re-engineering their devices not to allow it, there was a cost advantage to selling your data.

  • Mycenaman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It’s not flashing a custom ROM. It is installing an OS of users choice. Enemy’s language shouldn’t be used if we want things to change

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This is why “side load” is annoying to me. It’s installing. It is not special or different. They aren’t “blocking side loading” they’re “restricting what you can install.”

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m 100% okay with how my Samsung Galaxy handles it: You access the Developer mode by pressing on the phone info screen in the settings for several seconds, and then there’s a switch that allows execution of random .apk files.

        “Yes, do as I say.”

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          There was talk about Google changing this, but I’m not sure if that was something that would only affect Pixel phones or all of Android as an ecosystem. Well, to be specific, the change is to not let people run unsigned APKs at all and devs can only get them signed by giving their identification to Google.

          • Johnmannesca@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I think they’re testing out different regions to see if they’ll get sued before trying to do this globally

      • Mycenaman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        What makes it “custom”? If you install Linux on a laptop that comes with Windows pre-installed, is Linux then a custom OS it’s not being a default? Why phones are any different? Calling it custom you play to the manufacturers pockets making it sound shady and unofficial giving them right to take the control from the customers devices. Soon we won’t own anything we buy.

        • earthworm@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I’ve never thought a custom ROM sounded shady.

          To me it was always, “we only have vanilla or chocolate on the menu, but if you’re willing to risk bricking your phone, you can get cookies and cream.”

          I picked cookies and cream.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          To me it feels more like a full appliance as it’s not even intended primarily to install anything else.
          But I can also see your point as a valid argument.

        • herrvogel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Because for phones they kinda are custom. The smartphone hardware landscape is an absolute clusterfuck of proprietary blobs and closed source drivers and all sorts of shit that makes it so you need a lot of work to customize the base os to work on any particular device. ROMs have rather short lists of compatible phones, and each one of those had to have a build specifically developed for them. You can’t take, say, grapheneos and slap it on any phone you like.

          • Mycenaman@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            The same applies to every pre-installed OS. They are all customized from AOSP, but only third-party operating systems are called such. That was my point there.

  • stebator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Many users were buying OpenPlus Pro smartphones solely because of the ability to unlock the bootloader and flash custom ROMs. People value freedom and customization. OpenPlus is shooting itself in the foot.

    • evol@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      An increasingly small amount of their userbase cares about that now, its a mainstream device now

    • hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Oppo killed and ate OP a long time ago. They’ve just been wearing their skin like a suit up to this point, but their true nature is obvious at this point.

        • raldone01@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I also went with a pixel 6a with grafeneos because there are no other good options for me.

          I would have preferred fairphone 6 + calyx but that is on hiatus and I couldn’t wait longer.

        • festus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Sadly, at least in the North American market, Google’s Pixel phones are basically the last good phones you can reliably install your own ROM on.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    18 hours ago

    so it basically permanently “damages” the phone when you try to root it, seems like they are asking for a lawsuit at some point.

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I thought the difference there is that they were upfront about the feature in Knox and you can still install another OS, it just disables Pay and the Secure Notes part. Also it was something there from the start.

        This feels markedly different as it’s retroactive and a full brick, which is much more severe and a bait and switch.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          My last contact with it was on my Samsung S8. I was not aware of any “For your security we will monitor for OS changes” communication

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Why would they start with the harder one? Samsung is much better funded, and therefore will be a much more difficult case.

        And no, it does not matter that Samsung did it first.

  • hornedfiend@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    20 hours ago

    One plus joined my short list of “I can’t be bothered” companies like Samsung and Apple, Xiaomi, Oppo and some other sub par companies.

    • ragas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      And all that while OnePlus was awesome up until the OnePlus 7 pro.

      I had the 5t until last year and it was still awesome.