Sure, use duck-duck-go and search for “Michael Jackson pedophilia history”
Maybe Google would work too, not sure.
Lots of guilty people are acquitted, that doesn’t matter to me. Where I’m from, if 20 women say a guy is a rapist, he’s a rapist. That’s it. Regardless of courts and officially being found “guilty”.
If 20 children say “this guy is a pedophile”, I think they are a pedophile. I have my own evidentiary standards and am not limited to court decisions.
Courts also say “corporations are people” and all sorts of wacky shit, in USA courts are a joke.
So you have no more evidence than the jury who acquitted him, yet you still think he could have been acquitted. It’s obvious you have a motive here besides the truth of the matter. I’m glad people like you weren’t on that jury.
There’s evidence that they didn’t even get to see! So much of it, more than I am able to possibly list here.
It’s obvious you are pro the US courts, and can’t be trusted with serious decisions in any way. I would pray that if I ever went on a trial that you would be on my jury, because you are very naive and easy to manipulate. Why, with you on the jury I’d likely be acquitted!
Anyways, if 20 women say a man is a rapist, I think he’s a rapist. If 20 kids say a guy is a pedophile, I think they are a pedophile. And so on
But you go ahead and believe the “judges” like Clarence Thomas and Anthony Scalia, and their millionaire lawyer lackeys. It’s your call
Sure, use duck-duck-go and search for “Michael Jackson pedophilia history”
Maybe Google would work too, not sure.
Lots of guilty people are acquitted, that doesn’t matter to me. Where I’m from, if 20 women say a guy is a rapist, he’s a rapist. That’s it. Regardless of courts and officially being found “guilty”.
If 20 children say “this guy is a pedophile”, I think they are a pedophile. I have my own evidentiary standards and am not limited to court decisions.
Courts also say “corporations are people” and all sorts of wacky shit, in USA courts are a joke.
So you have no more evidence than the jury who acquitted him, yet you still think he could have been acquitted. It’s obvious you have a motive here besides the truth of the matter. I’m glad people like you weren’t on that jury.
There’s evidence that they didn’t even get to see! So much of it, more than I am able to possibly list here.
It’s obvious you are pro the US courts, and can’t be trusted with serious decisions in any way. I would pray that if I ever went on a trial that you would be on my jury, because you are very naive and easy to manipulate. Why, with you on the jury I’d likely be acquitted!
Anyways, if 20 women say a man is a rapist, I think he’s a rapist. If 20 kids say a guy is a pedophile, I think they are a pedophile. And so on
But you go ahead and believe the “judges” like Clarence Thomas and Anthony Scalia, and their millionaire lawyer lackeys. It’s your call