The actual proposal to Congress in that article reads…
“adopt a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution pursuant to article V of the United States Constitution to clarify the constitutional right to bear arms.”
That’s not removing 2a. The comment of repealing was just that, a comment. That specific comment didn’t make it to the official request to Congress.
The actual proposal to Congress in that article reads…
“adopt a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution pursuant to article V of the United States Constitution to clarify the constitutional right to bear arms.”
That’s not removing 2a. The comment of repealing was just that, a comment. That specific comment didn’t make it to the official request to Congress.
Really…you do realize that amending it is just an easier way to basically say it’s null and void.
On top of that, you asked I provided. Let’s stop pretending that their aren’t dems who want it repealed.