A Harvard Business Review study is answering the question ‘what will employees do if AI saves them time at work?’ The answer: more work.
A Harvard Business Review study is answering the question ‘what will employees do if AI saves them time at work?’ The answer: more work.
Yeah, after all, LLMs are known for their ability to do things correctly and not make up tons of random bullshit.
This is too generalised of a statement. You could say the same about people. I could tell you about how well these things (notLLMs in general, I mean mature use cases) actually work at many companies I’ve seen it, but you still won’t accept it so what’s the point.
I would struggle to accept any statement that doesn’t match with my experience and the experience of the vast majority of the people I talk to about this.
Because you can tell me the sky is purple polka dots, but without evidence I’m not going to do more than listen to your experience.
I know it’s hard to reflect topics from different perspectives. No tech ever had zero use cases. I’ve worked in data science with NLP since word2vec came out in 2016. I’ve seen and implemented hundreds of solutions. I agree that most of the implementations of LLMs are insane and wrong, but that’s what happens with every tech at the peak of inflated expectations. Let me know what kind of evidence you want.