Meta has been granted a patent outlining an AI system capable of simulating a user’s activity on social media to post after their death.

Some fucked up shit.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    We are going to need a lot of new laws to stop nonsense like this. There is nothing positive to come from faking humans that are dead.

  • tino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    the future is when you can’t buy RAM because your dead cousin is using it to spam your feed with their antivaxx ideas.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Ah yes, my machine spirit will continue posting against the Trump Regime long after I died while fighting the kakistocracy.

    What? That’s against the TOS?!

    • [object Object]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Prime time to remind that Meta probably cranks out five hundred patents every day in case they ever have to engage in patent warfare against competitors. For the simple reason that the competitors are doing the same thing.

      The patents cover every little thing under the sun that they can think of, but oddly I don’t see each of those patents discussed online.

  • Novis@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s fucking… why would a patent office let that be a thing? FUCK

        • Novis@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          2 days ago

          What? Come on! It made the judge “feel” something! Not like someone’s died or something! /s

      • mech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        Judge Todd Lang of Maricopa County Superior Court ultimately sentenced Pelkey’s killer Gabriel Paul Horcasitas to 10.5 years for manslaughter — although the state had asked for only 9.5 years — and 12.5 years in total, including an endangerment charge.

        “I love that AI. Thank you for that,” Lang said, a recording of the hearing shows.

        WTF.

        • Novis@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, ain’t it great that judges can be easily swayed by some bullshit? Good country, ethics really well here.

      • dellish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        How is that even admissible in court? It’s worse than hearsay, it’s madeupsay.

        If your honour pleases, we have used AI to turn this child’s crayon drawing into the defendant pleading guilty! I’ll allow it.

        For fucks sake.

    • turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The job of the patent office is to determine whether that’s a valid patent application or not. As in, can you actually patent that thing, has someone else already patented it etc. As long as it’s technically valid, it gets approved. It’s up to the patent holder to test if its actually useful or not. If they choose to build the thing IRL, it’s up to the courts to determine if that breaks any laws. Every step along the way, the general public is there to judge the moral integrity of said invention, but usually that has no impact on the validity of the patent. Depending on jurisdiction, the patent office may need to follow some moral guielines, but the threshold of rejection is very high. My guess is, you won’t be able to patent a gas chamber for exterminating “illegal immigrants”, but patenting wild Meta BS is technically fine.

      See also: this abomination