US Democratic Senator Mark Kelly has said he will “seriously consider” running for president in 2028 as he battles the Trump administration over a video in which he urged military personnel to refuse illegal orders.

The Arizona senator, who was accused of “seditious behaviour” by Donald Trump over the November clip, said he and his wife, Gabrielle Giffords, received “many” death threats after the president’s comments.

“We get them on a weekly basis now,” he told BBC Newsnight. “We had to get security to protect us 24 hours a day.”

Asked if he was considering a White House run, the retired Navy captain said he was considering it “because we’re in some seriously challenging times”.

  • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 hours ago

    You nailed it on the head. If AOC runs, I’m absolutely voting for her. If not, Kelly seems a lot better than Newsom.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah Kelley seems to be a centrist with a soul. I don’t want another fucking centrist but I really must insist on a candidate with a soul

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I love AOC, I think she’s the future of the country, but please please PLEASE do not nominate another candidate with a vagina in 2028. We’re just not ready for that.

      I am selfish as a New York State resident and want to keep her, and give her Chuck’s seat in 2028. Maybe after a term or three in the Senate we’ll be ready to elect someone without a penis as President.

      • Krono@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 hours ago

        PLEASE do not nominate another candidate with a vagina

        It’s so frustrating when well-meaning people have this blatantly sexist take.

        The problem with Hillary and Kamala was not their vaginas, it was their policies.

        If you actually believe that the US is too sexist to elect a woman, then you need to explain the election of Claudia Sheinbaum in Mexico. By every statistic (rape, domestic violence, etc), Mexico is a more sexist nation than the US, yet they overwhelmingly elected a woman.

      • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 hours ago

        What utter BS. We have progressive women winning races in the house and Senate so the problem isn’t having a damn vagina. The issue is the last two women presidential candidates were neoliberal jackasses that had crappy policies and dismissive attitudes toward their electorate.

        Sure be selfish and say you want to keep her representation local but piss of saying a woman can’t win and then say don’t even try.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          55 minutes ago

          The Presidency is a bridge too far, though.

          Ask yourself: why did Joe Biden, of all people, win, where Clinton and Harris didnt? It certainly wasn’t because he had fewer “crappy policies” than they did.

          America, as a whole, is simply too misogynistic to elect a woman as President right now but, they are at least self-aware to know they can’t say that out loud. So we get excuses, instead, like “I don’t like her laugh” or “I just don’t agree with her”.

          My favorite was a dude who said “I can’t vote for Harris, she reminds me too much of my ex-wife”. At least he’s honest.