The specialist in neurodevelopmental issues argues the case for banning social media for under-16s: ‘Those who had a smartphone with free access to internet content before the age of 15 have worse mental health indicators’
You ever notice how no one ever recommends doing things that are empowering even when the data says they actually do protect children? Only ever restrictions?
The domination of children is fundamental for conservatism. Even leftists and liberals have been brainwashed into thinking the “traditional” family unit is a good, natural thing, when it is very clearly a vehicle for child abuse.
The Epstein class don’t give even a little bit of a shit about protecting kids, of course they don’t, they want to exploit them. The fact that the mainstream is actually buying into these lies is depressing. Everyone is accepting it with very little evidence.
A classic way of knowing your biases is to know what you’ll accept without evidence.
You ever notice how no one ever recommends doing things that are empowering even when the data says they actually do protect children? Only ever restrictions?
The domination of children is fundamental for conservatism. Even leftists and liberals have been brainwashed into thinking the “traditional” family unit is a good, natural thing, when it is very clearly a vehicle for child abuse.
The Epstein class don’t give even a little bit of a shit about protecting kids, of course they don’t, they want to exploit them. The fact that the mainstream is actually buying into these lies is depressing. Everyone is accepting it with very little evidence.
A classic way of knowing your biases is to know what you’ll accept without evidence.
I hate how so many people are falling for the propaganda. I want a better solution than traditional.families