Probably simpler, you just want to keep track of what your customers prefer. That’s just good customer service.

Hot dang, I read a cbs news article and it didn’t mention that. I even went back to check. Isn’t cbs under new ownership or something?

Didn’t they already get the letters or something? But I would assume they pay for the month up front, so that is a great point.

I didn’t see anything about securing snap benefits or anything. Is that a side effect kind of thing?

In fairness, it was only 8 democrates. But yeah, I am not sure why the Republicans would give in in January if they wouldn’t now.

Schumer voted no. I’m looking for real reasons that won’t get me laughed out of the room for being uninformed.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/government-shutdown-senate-deal/

Some year long funding for the VA, reversal of any federal job cuts from october 1st on. And blocking further job cuts for a little while. Nothing massive, but not small either. And it only ends the shut down for about 2.5 months. I still don’t like it, but I can’t argue that it is nothing either.

Yeah, the commenter suggested the “retired” atc unionize and offer to return for a while to help out. The next commentor said that didn’t go so well during the Regan year, but that was the active ATC. The retired atc can’t strike… they are retired.

I mean they did get some things in other areas. The argument I am hearing is that the deal won’t get better. And I find it hard to counter that myself.

I’ve heard this argument that the deal they got wasn’t going to get any better in a few places. What are the counter arguments to that?
Because it was working, trumps numbers are down a bit, the election losses. But those didn’t phase the Republicans at all seemingly. I personally think they still should have held out, but I don’t have any logic for my stance. Is there any?

They already have been. They shot a christian pastor in the face with a pepper ball.

Do explain how the active ATC employees trying to unionize is the same as retired ATC employees unionizing and offering thier services is not different?

Yeah, so not the same thing.

Bah, they will just blame democrates…

I don’t believe they “resigned” in the 80s. They went on strike.

Having played a lot of raft with my kids, I can say I never would have thought of it for this. But looking back, yeah, there is a good deal of world building going on.

Read what you posted. The context is saying that they don’t know for sure what % of the population knew, and they lay out some arguments supporting both sides. You used the link as if it proved the population didn’t know. But that clearly isn’t what it says.

My point wasn’t that the link proved the opposite of your opinion, it was that the link doesn’t prove your opinion. That is a different bar.

The word “however” basically means “in contrast to the previous sentence”. It exclusion doesn’t change the meaning of the quote. It simply shortens it by allowing the exclusion of the previous sentence. I am not disputing that some experts believe the population didn’t know. I am disputing that the link proves that the consensus of experts believe the population didn’t know. That is how you presented the link, with obvious intent to mislead anyone who didn’t read it into thinking it supported as fact that the population didn’t know.

I don’t know the full details of that check, but I doubt it. The key peice where these checks fail is checking that the person standing in front of you is who they say they are. The person they claim to be will pass all the checks. Verification of identity mostly relies on photo ID, which isn’t all that hard to fake, or even to get legitimately.

Because I could be an employer if I had some hussle, and I couldn’t spot a fake social security card to save my life. I believe the employer files the I-9, and if the gov says it’s fine, they are off the hook. That is why people say that illegal aliens pay taxes. Cause they often do, under someone elses social.

Wait, what are you claiming Wikipedia is saying?

“many historians argue that Germans were provided information explicit enough to indicate that the Jewish people were being massacred”