so another thursday then?
so another thursday then?
well i mean he did, but really there is no comparison.
just got to reset it every 100 years or so. we may be overdue
deceleration is not enough by a country mile.
since the 1770’s i know of two wars the US has won against an insurgency.
the US has been in a LOT of wars though. and one of the things they learned was that bombs were not very effective, and the us would have a much worse time off it bombing their own cities. A-wall’s and desertions would go through the roof, they would be out gunned a thousand to one, with literally more guns then people. Isfulstructure they would rely on is vulnerable from every angle, the government would be prisoners in their own bunkers.
it would be devestating if the us has an insurgency
and with such vast power and influence… name the victories the US has had verses an insurgency on their own turf?
and that’s considering untouchable industrial military complex, logistics pipeline, more numerous, better trained, and armed forces, unlimited money, and no real push back from the american populous.
if one appeared within the US… it would be absolutely devastating to the military
your argument is just an unpresuasive as the last time you parotted it. either democrats will provide a candidate that backs my interests or i won’t vote for them. period.
at any time
we have had this discussion before… it was extensive.
if my choice is between him and any republican, then bring on the end of democracy. enough with the farce. i will no longer vote to further gild this age.
that’s for the democrats to decide. but i will not vote for him full stop. they have time to change if they wish. but voting for him is a non starter
no matter what i will not vote for him
except they do the exact same thing so you are not escaping the problem with paypal
its a power play to enforce dominance
i am claiming what i said. the poster you commented to was being obviously hyperbolic. i don’t know what the gun laws are around pnw. but around here they vary wildly depending on where i go. the point of them was never to be insurmountable, but to be difficult enough to arm the correct people and to dissuade ownership for another.
are you arguing that stricter gun laws are not a barrier to arming oneself?
and here we are,
you’re validating the fears of the very people you dismissed, in the most backward ‘you might have been right about this’ I’ve ever seen, after decades of making gun ownership a partisan issue.
and then you ask me why haven’t i sacrificed my life to go on a murder spree… to kill your enemies… this is exactly what you are asking.
i don’t see where to join the Northwest Secessionist Forces, or any real opposition group to tyranny right now. what? is schumer going to send another nastygram?
i highly recommend that if you are or know a disabled person, someone on the LBGTQ+ spectrum, or a minority, to get armed and get proficient in its use.
oh they are talking about AAA and AAAA games, so then they are not buying/playing fewer games but moved to the indie scene.
you mean… there are limits, because your employment is not decided by the government (“directly”).