Counter Surface to Air Missile equipment or ordinance.

Why not just say Child Porn or Explicit Images of Children? Who are we protecting by refusing to say the words?

My dumb ass sitting here confused for a solid minute thinking CSAM was in reference to a type of artillery.

Heh, check the authors names.

The only unrealistic part is that AI would generate fake references.

Hopefully the buck stops here because the SCOTUS have already ruled the opposite in past examples.

And its method of depicting that is showing a doctor asking a valid and important question.

The issue of being a good doctor?

“Well, nothing is certain yet, but you might be pregnant.”

That explains why the ten thousand years of recorded history is filled with random violence and wars, but the point that I’m making is that things like Dictionaries and Encyclopedias and other written records should decide what is correct. They do indeed adapt over time when they have deemed things have sufficiently changed to update the definitions.

Just like how scientists decide what is science, historians decide what is history, so too should linguists decide what is proper use of a specific language.

Instructions unclear, venn diagram still curvy.

If they’re making a mistake in public and it leads to repercussions for all of us, better to correct their mistake.

Technically Wales has conquered England, at least twice I think, but due to events unknown to myself they and the English monarchy merged and now English Royals get appointed Prince of Wales.

I feel like those lines are way too straight to be proper proximities to a point.

It’s sad but at least it’s still competition where desperately needed.

I’m going to disagree here on the basis that this logic leads to bubbles of people thinking they’re right when they’re not even close to a majority.

Or more like, just the people that post them.

Trump tired of controversy? Are we finally getting out of the bad timeline?

It is relevant and important context because we solve this problem by convincing the millions of people, not the rich.

A wise famous playwrite once said:

"Putting the cart before the horse ".

More like he signed up to do this job and thats why they gave it to him in the first place. His predecessor retired recently.

Also it doesn’t excuse the action even if it were true.

Well, added context is billionaires won’t fund your campaign causing your public relations to drop. Then you lose.

We shouldn’t just scapegoat the rich for something that tens of millions of people vote for while tens of millions more don’t vote at all.