just_another_person@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agoTrump administration mulling end to habeas corpus, legal right to challenge one’s detentionwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1283arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1279arrow-down1external-linkTrump administration mulling end to habeas corpus, legal right to challenge one’s detentionwww.theguardian.comjust_another_person@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square24fedilinkfile-text
Losing everywhere in courts, so now you think you can just sidestep them by changing the constitution? Lolz
minus-squareLinktank@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up68arrow-down1·1 day agoI don’t think they have the right to take that away.
minus-squareHulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 hours agoThey don’t have the right (because it’s illegal) to do a lot of the stuff they’ve done and yet here we are.
minus-squareAshMan85@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·1 day agobut they think they do and that is dangerous
minus-squareZak@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·13 hours agoI’m not sure they think they do legitimately. They probably don’t care about that; they think they can try it and might get away with it for a while.
minus-squaresuburban_hillbilly@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 day agoThey don’t have the right to deny due process either. Still happening.
minus-squareBlameThePeacock@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36arrow-down2·1 day ago“privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” That’s the wording in the constitution. They just say that undocumented migrants amount to an invasion and they can suspend it. It’s not like the supreme court is going to override them on that.
minus-squareTransplantedSconie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 day agoI dunno. The appeals court straight up said it is in no way, shape, or form an invasion, and they have to have their day in court no if, and, or buts. I think it’s 7-2 against trump.
minus-squareAsafum@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 day agoThey have any and every “right” that no one denies them by actual force of action. The courts will wag their finger and the administration will say “You’re a Marxist, I don’t have to listen to you. Fuck you.” :(
I don’t think they have the right to take that away.
They don’t have the right (because it’s illegal) to do a lot of the stuff they’ve done and yet here we are.
They do not.
but they think they do and that is dangerous
I’m not sure they think they do legitimately. They probably don’t care about that; they think they can try it and might get away with it for a while.
They don’t have the right to deny due process either. Still happening.
“privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”
That’s the wording in the constitution. They just say that undocumented migrants amount to an invasion and they can suspend it.
It’s not like the supreme court is going to override them on that.
I dunno.
The appeals court straight up said it is in no way, shape, or form an invasion, and they have to have their day in court no if, and, or buts.
I think it’s 7-2 against trump.
They have any and every “right” that no one denies them by actual force of action. The courts will wag their finger and the administration will say “You’re a Marxist, I don’t have to listen to you. Fuck you.”
:(