• MechanicalJester@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Short answer: good luck with that. Deployable up to 100K. Total population you’re trying to control is 15 million. So 1 per 150 citizens.

    Except it obviously would quickly need to include the Bay Area, St Louis, Indianapolis, Portland, Seattle etc

    • MrErr@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      11 hours ago

      We had a bad choice and a worse choice. So i said let it all fall.

      • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        So i said let it all fall.

        At lest vote 3rf party.

        Otherwise the material reality is that you got out the way for the worse choice. Obstruction isn’t ideal, but its helpful none the less

      • twelve20two @slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 hours ago

        At least with the bad choice more people would have energy and resources to fight back in more meaningful ways.

        • III@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Worse option is exiling American citizens, tanking the economy, persecuting minorities, taking away rights, ignoring the constitution and, notably, full backing genocide in Gaza.

          Bad option would not act to stop genocide in Gaza.

          Clearly the same thing.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That was never the criticism from anyone actually opposing Trump. The criticism is that she built her career as a cop, locking people up for minor offenses, fighting to keep them in prison for cheap labor, and then went on to campaign for the most lethal military machine on Earth. But sure, go ahead and whitewash her record because it’s easier to joke than to confront the fact that your “lesser evil” still has blood on her hands.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          I said criticism, you think no one who opposed Trump should have criticised former cop who built her career on locking people up?

          ACAB, just not one of the worst kind?

      • twelve20two @slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I only really saw those criticisms of her from people already on the left. What I saw (in generalized and slightly exaggerated manner) from conservatives was, “NO, SHE’S A LIBERAL, WOKE, COMMUNIST WHO WANTS TO DESTROY AMERICA!”

        To which most people I saw on the left respond with, “Communist? The former cop and DA?”

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Every criticism presented is completely true. She would have been better than trump, but she was a terrible Democratic candidate. She would have made a better Republican candidate. Her campaign would only needed to have focused on her prosecutorial career.

  • heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    He’s getting everything prepared for when he denies the next election. He doesn’t want to lose power to a pesky thing called democracy.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      It’s way more than that. We’re only 7 months in. This is complete power grab, complete takeover. Democracy will only barely matter by 2026. And there will be no loss to deny.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yep, and there’s no way to stop him. Everyone just sat there looking while politicians slowly dismantled all the protections.

    • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Trump floats the idea of starting a civil war

      Russia floats the idea of a new American Civil war. FTFY.

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Russia already won their information campaign. NATO is dismantled, Europe is weak and the US doesn’t listen to Europe’s complaints and concerns anymore. Leaving them free to start wars wherever they want in Eurasia, no one will stop them. America is checked out, and Europe doesnt have the guts to make a stand.

    • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I reluctantly welcome that, if only because that is permission to force his ilk into a well deserved box. At this point, I consider the Turdpublicans and Geronocrats to be the enemy of anyone who isn’t wealthy.

      We are already at war, it is just that ordinary people believed we were all part of the same society.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    197
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Look, the Epstein shit is important, and it’s important that we keep it in the conversation, but this isn’t a fucking distraction. Do people seriously not understand how dire this is? This isn’t a fucking joke. We are deep into full-on fascism now.

    • bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 hours ago

      thanks man, finally someone else saying it!

      We’ve been chasing the dragon since 2016: This is gonna bring him down, that is gonna bring him down, oh no but wait, this is definitely going to finish him off. How is the Epstein story ever going to harm him in any way?

      In reality those things are the distractions from the real shit that’s been happening. Now that he’s accelerating his fascist actions in plain sight, how dare anyone say it’s just a distraction? This narrative only works in his favour, jfc.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I work at Microsoft and they just did massive layoffs all of this year. Last round I was layed off. 9000 of us in the last round.

      I say this, because, I think people might associate tech jobs and education with being more liberal and pro immigrantion. This is not the case at all. The liberals are being offered fascism as a means to deal with their unemployment and will accept it with open arms as their material conditions decline. Most people I know from my job would absolutely join ICE for the paycheck as the tech sector lays off more and more people.

      I’m sure we are seeing this in other industries as well. But just sharing for mine. ICE is going to look like an attractive job for a lot “middle class” Americans to be able to make rent. None of them are having class conflict conversations either. These people have next to no idea of what is going on.

      We will not just get the hogs joining ICE. You’re gonna see a lot of liberals start to justify it as their livelihood starts to get connected to it too. This is how fascism works.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That’s a really good point. I remember at the most recent DEFCON, Cory Doctorow got a heckton of cheers when he was talking about tech workers waking up to the fact that they were workers, and are beginning to push towards unionising. In the comments, people were glad to hear the cheers, seeing it as evidence of the shifting tide that Doctorow spoke of.

        However, as you highlight, this mass squeezing of the middle class will also send a significant chunk of people over to Fascism. We definitely shouldn’t become complacent

        • wheezy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          I would say there are definitely some people that care as the industry becomes more and more exploited for its labor. But I have yet to meet a software developer that has connected their pro labor sentiment to real class solidarity.

          Most complain about H1 people taking their jobs but blame the H1 people themselves and not the corporation that is exploiting their labor.

          I try to explain to them that there is no labor movement in our industry that will be successful without H1 holders being on our side at the negotiating table.

          It’s a really hard thing to get through to a lot of people.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        19 hours ago

        When the economy crashes it will be the ICE half of the poor killing the other half poor - that’s the plan.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 day ago

      As someone watching from out side, no shit. The us has crossed the Rubicon a while ago, no longer a nation based on laws, no longer a place that people have rights, no longer a place with free elections (well this one has been around for a bit with the stupid 2 party system) and no longer a place other nations want to do business with.

      The most infuriating part of this has been watching americans (and more of the rest of the world then I would have liked) act like this is all potentially bad and then normalizing just flat out dystopian shit. Like shit this is not even the first place troops have been deployed to put down political “wrong speak”.

      • SupahRevs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        This is exactly whats happening. Every fascist act is normalized. There is no line to cross. There are just constant moves that are more and more harmful. Sinclair Lewis wrote about this almost 100 years ago.

      • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        62
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Those “fancy steps” are the only things that would make this legal. Without them, all he’s doing is violating the Constitution. DC presents a unique loophole for this. Anywhere else, and he’s breaking the law.

        • tane69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          60
          ·
          2 days ago

          Surely this time he’s done for.

          Hate to break it to you man but the law does not matter. It really never has for the rich and powerful but he has laid it all bare

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’ve said time and time again we let the entire Bush admin off the hook for war crimes… Trump hasn’t even hit war crimes levels yet. Did anyone think we were ever going to hold him to account when we wouldn’t even do anything about that?

            • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              20 hours ago

              He committed was crimes in his first term. Ordering an assassination of an islamism general using a diplomatic meeting to lure him out… Is very explicitly a war crime.

            • bigfondue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              26
              ·
              2 days ago

              I think it started sooner, with Nixon being pardoned and all the senior Reagan White House officials getting away with Iran-Contra

              • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I don’t disagree, I guess I just felt like Bush’s war crimes of torture within our own military was pretty directly egregious whereas the whole point of Iran-Contra was that the Contras were the ones committing the violence, not US soldiers at the command of their leadership. Plausible deniability and all that. Like, if our society was ever going to give a shit, that should be have been the straw that broke the camels back since there was nothing plausibly deniable about “enhanced interrogation.”

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 hours ago

                  There are so many people who were radicalized by 9/11, that then went on to give Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc. carte blanche to do horrific things to people.

          • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            The law does matter. People don’t seem to realize just how much of Trump’s bullshit has already been stopped by the courts.

            The majority of his executive orders have all been blocked or straight-up nullified, so far…but thanks to the overwhelming volume of court cases and the long delays in reaching some decisions…the media never covers the outcomes to the same extent.

            • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              they get their information from the news and social media. both of which are A > Sensationalised,
              B > Partisan , and C > Incredibly full of shit and misinformation

            • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              Exactly, he is escalating bc he is feeling pressure. He is getting worried about the midterms. That is not to say that the law will surely prevail in the end, but just to point out that he wouldn’t even be bothering to test the waters with threats of “maybe your city is next” if he didn’t believe he would see pushback.

              He’s already sent and recalled much of the military in L.A., so what tf is he even talking about? Floating the idea of sending them again only to then recall them again?

              D.C. has gained autonomy as a city, but keep in mind it was already unique compared to Chicago, LA, and NY bc it’s already a federal district. When he called for a “federal takeover” a few days ago, he meant stripping the city of its autonomy in terms of taking the power from the mayor.

              When he tried to take LA the first time, he experienced pushback from both city and state governments. Military morale was reportedly extremely low, he made them sleep on the floor bc he didn’t really have any kind of a plan other than a show of force. In the end, he basically succeeded in a public show of wasting money and resources for absolutely nothing.

              Now what? He’s going to send in the troops again? Surely they’ll get the job done the second time around.

            • tane69@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              24
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Buddy if the law mattered even one fucking iota trump himself would be buried under the prison.

              • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                17 hours ago

                If the law was perfect or if the law even worked as intended, he would have been in prison a long time ago.

                If the law didn’t matter at all, he wouldn’t bother making threats and testing the waters. The military never would have been recalled from LA the first time around. The FBI would have already arrested the TX Democrats in Chicago, and TX Republicans would have just gone ahead with the redistricting without a second thought (which even I’m pretty surprised that they didn’t).

                Will the law alone prevail and save us in the end? Not likely, but there is a difference between being naive and not allowing yourself to panic and be backed into a corner of black and white thinking. In many ways, doing so is accepting defeat.

                Being smart and strategizing means using the law and along with everything else to your advantage while you still can. Trump has been bulldozing through law bc his goal is to betray his own country. Democrats in TX are breaking the law, but they’re doing it strategically to save their country. They’re aligning themselves with Democrats in other states, and uniting as Americans. That’s what we all should be doing.

                • tane69@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Oh okay please explain how the law works I’m sure youre a lawyer or a judge or some other type of legal expert. We’re all dying to hear how our president isn’t guilty of literally dozens and possibly hundreds of serious financial and sexual crimes dating back to the 1980s, or how he is guilty and the fact that he hasn’t been punished is just “how the law works”

                  Man I hate lemmoids

                • Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  He would be dead shortly after being locked up because he wouldn’t survive withdrawal from his fast food and orange makeup addiction.

            • dogerwaul@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              2 days ago

              whenever an EO gets challenged or struck down, Trump figures out a way to get rid of the problem or go around it. the only thing the law is doing is showing him vulnerabilities to exploit. state injunctions are legally being ignored thanks to SCOTUS, so… Trump does not have to listen to judges.

        • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          2 days ago

          He’s breaking the law all over the US, when you’re rich… they let you. This is no different. Let’s see some consequences somewhere.

          • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            2 days ago

            No one is “letting him”. There are dozens of active cases against him and his administration, right now. The process takes time, and the media never covers it adequately…but the system is still working.

            • GuyFawkes@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              1 day ago

              If the system were working Cannon could not have effectively blocked Trump’s prosecution. If the system were working the leader of an insurrection against the government of the United States could not have even RUN for President, much less BEEN SWORN IN. If the system were working the personal attorney for the most vile and morally corrupt President in our nation’s history would not have been NONINATED, much less CONFIRMED to a federal appellate court.

              THE SYSTEM IS NOT WORKING. Any conclusions predicated on another other assumption are simply wrong.

              • tane69@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                He won’t realize until they come for him. People like him are how it happens

              • dogerwaul@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 day ago

                isn’t it disgusting? depressing as hell how these people still feel so confident in “the system.”

              • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                So…do you agree with Trump when he tries to suspend or ignore the legal process? Is that your solution? Just, “as long as it’s us doing it, it’s fine”?

                It’s kind of bizarre to advocate for the very same shit he’s pulling, as a defense against the kind of shit he keeps trying to pull.

            • dogerwaul@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              you’re right that the system is working. it is giving us its ultimate: fascism. this is the intended outcome for profit seeking capitalists. if you mean to say our system of American justice is working… surely you jest.

            • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              That’s entirely the point. Legal channels are too show to counteract everything at once. See Bannon’s “stress test”.

              • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                Dude. That’s literally the same argument Trump was using for why he should be allowed to just deport people without due process. This is not the “solution” you think it is.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It doesn’t fucking matter. He’ll do it all anyway, without ever declaring martial law. And what the fuck is anyone going to do about it?

          • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Martial Law is too obvious.

            Russia is in full scale war, and has not formally declared war, but they are operating as if they have. Trump would do the same, a bunch of different declarations that are in practice, Martial law, but without actually saying it, because Martial law is too obvious of a rubicon.

            GOP MAGA is trying to boil the frog, what determines if there will be a revolution or not is if huge parts of the country suddenley believe we’ve crossed the rubicon, the point of no return. And it benefits MAGA for those people to have unique turning points, some will wait until X happens, Some wont take up arms until Y happens, It benefits them to boil the frog slowly, because it allows them to secure their position more and more before a potential confrontation happens

            declaring martial law is a clear sign to everyone “Yup, Im declaring the civil war” its too obvious, it doesnt benefit Trump to do that until he thinks he is ready, and at that point he’s already won and will be untouchable.

            • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              It means even less, if your first impulse is to toss it all out the window as soon as it’s no longer convenient for you to follow it.

        • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          And the consequences of him breaking the law will be…? He’ll get arrested and prosecuted like a civilian?