• addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 days ago

    4K for me as a developer means that I can have a couple of source files and a browser with the API documentation open at the same time. I reckon I could use legitimately use an 8K screen - get a terminal window or two open as well, keep an eye on builds and deployments while I’m working on a ticket.

    Now yes - gaming and watching video at 8K. That’s phenomenally niche, and very much a case of diminishing returns. But some of us have to work for a living as well, alas, and would like them pixels.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Even as a dev, I use a 32" QHD screen for programming. If I went 4K, I would need to use 150% scaling, and that breaks a LOT of stuff.

      Everything is built for 100% scaling. Every time I’ve plugged my PC into a 4K display I’ve regretted it. It go to 30Hz (on HDMI) or glitch out or something. Even if it doesn’t, it’s never as smooth.

      • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        I have a 43" 4K and at that physical size display scaling at 100% is appropriate (despite windows trying to run it at 300% out of the box) and it is legitimately useful. Its effectively four 1080p screens in a grid with no bezel between.

    • Hazzard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Good point, 4K text for programming is pretty fantastic, if you don’t mind small text and use a big monitor, I could see 8K bringing some worthwhile clarity improvements to some productivity workflows. It’s probably better for monitors than it is for TVs.