The FBI employee was fired on the first day of the government shutdown as Trump threatened more terminations.

FBI Director Kash Patel on Wednesday fired an agent in training for displaying a gay pride flag on his desk while appointed to a field office in California last year, according to three people familiar with the matter.

The trainee, who previously worked as an FBI support specialist in Los Angeles, received a letter — dated Oct. 1 and signed by Patel — claiming he had displayed an improper “political” message in the workplace during his assignment in California under President Joe Biden, according to a copy of the letter shared with MSNBC.

The letter cited President Donald Trump’s Article II powers under the Constitution to dismiss federal agency career personnel, a justification used in several recent firings at the Department of Justice and FBI. The terminations are currently being challenged in several lawsuits.

    • altphoto@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      His physical appearance is not his fault or the thing that I disagree with. Its the evil decisions that irk me.

      Like we had a department of defense that protected us from outside threats. But we renamed it department of war and pointed it at ourselves. WTF! How does that make any sense at all?

      • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They didn’t even rename it, it’s still the Department of Defesne… they couldn’t get the votes to actually change it. Department of War is a “cool nickname” Hegseth gave the department, it’s officially a “secondary name”. Sort of like their preferred pronoun. Don’t deadname them, I’m sure they’d hate to keep getting called Department of Defense.

      • ILoveUnions@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Like we had a department of defense that protected us from outside threats

        It’s always been a department of war.

  • gnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Kash Patel felt threatened because the FBI trainee was more qualified to run things.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The letter cited President Donald Trump’s Article II powers under the Constitution to dismiss federal agency career personnel, a justification used in several recent firings at the Department of Justice and FBI.

    Governing by presidential decree is as close as you can get to absolute monarchy - or, let’s called it as it is, fascist tyranny - in this country. And they already started dismantling the last remaining obstacles. As he himself said “if you vote for me you’ll never have to vote again”.

    The terminations are currently being challenged in several lawsuits.

    Good.

    This shit is horrible, but it gets worse. People are dying from this regime.

  • Kalon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Don’t know that laws matter anymore but firing someone based on sexual orientation is illegal.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Hey! Hey guys, hear me out. We should have a Catholic priest run something. Like maybe National air traffic control.

    Every day a pilot, after the routine checks must then have do the cross signing thing before they start up the engine. Three hail Mary’s before the plane moves.

    Stuff like that just makes my day happier. Having to watch an adult do dumb things because it pleases an invisible flying man who we cannot communicate with, it just makes my day.

    Let’s have more goat sacrifices and describe the stars as souls so the space station stays up there.

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    While I think this government is loaded with pedophile scum and they should all be shot out of a canon into the sun, I don’t think this is a first amendment rights violation.

    If the person in question had been fired for hanging a pride flag in his apartment window, that would be a violation of his first amendment rights. However putting it on his desk in a federal office building is different.

    The federal government shouldn’t be seen as endorsing any particular view. Unfortunately, if some homophobic dickhead needs to talk to an agent, they shouldn’t be concerned about whether the agent will treat them differently.

    The scum running the FBI likely wouldn’t care if someone was displaying a Nazi flag on their desk, but they’d probably be forced to respond.

    Or maybe not.

    • snooggums@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Acknowledging people exist isn’t political. Regressives act like it is, but it isn’t.

      A pride flag on a desk is like having pictures of your kids on your desk.

      • NABDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Acknowledging people exist isn’t political.

        It would be much a nicer world to live in if that was true.

        EVERYTHING is political, and we live in a world where fascists make existence a political issue.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The comparison to a Nazi flag is absurd. A better comparison would be if an agent had a straight price flag on their desk. And no, the agent would not have lost their job under this regime for such a display.

      • NABDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I wasn’t really intending to suggest it was equivalent. I was just thinking of something we could almost universally agree shouldn’t be permitted… but probably would be by the current administration.

        In effect, I was reaching for the absurd. If it was a free speech issue, then a Nazi flag would be just as protected.