• plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    The law exists and it’s old. The situation is not good but the article is rage bait.

    Although the US Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to levy taxes, including tariffs, Congress has passed laws allowing the President to impose tariffs for national security reasons unilaterally.

    Trump directed the USTR to initiate similar investigations to impose tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariffs_in_the_second_Trump_administration

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        That depends on your political affiliation. Democrats could have changed the law years ago but haven’t.

        Overall it’s more concerning because it reveals that accumulation of power in the hands of the president has been happening for years with no opposition.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Exactly

          The Dems could have also ended the tax rates Trump started. They could have expanded SCOTUS, removed the filibuster, or citizens united, and they chose not to try to push the needle back in any meaningful way.

          Through their actions, Dems imply their longterm goals are alligned with Republicans.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Bullshit. We’ve gone through that months ago and your link states

      Federal courts have ruled that the tariffs imposed under the IEEPA are illegal

      And that has nothing to do with the President claiming he can allocate that money as he sees fit

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        claiming he can allocate that money as he sees fit

        I was not able to find any document about it but I remember reading that that’s how it has been handled.