References
- Type: Image. Title: “Traffic by Operating System”. Publisher: [“Pornhub”>“2025 YEAR IN REVIEW”]. Published: 2025-12-03. Accessed: 2025-12-16T23:00Z. URI: https://www.pornhub.com/insights/2025-year-in-review.
- Location: §“Traffic by Operating System”.
THIS IS THE YEAR OF LINUX DESKTOP.
22.4% of 5% base, so in actuality a 1% increase. While the title is technically accurate, it’s very misleading.
A percentage increase is a relative increase. The thing you’re thinking of would be described as “percentage points”.
It’s somewhat misleading to talk about a large percentage increase on a small base, though.
A percentage increase is a relative increase. The thing you’re thinking of would be described as “percentage points”.
Yes, as I pointed out it is technically correct. Just a misleading first impression.
It’s not at all misleading. That’s how percantages work. It plainly says ‘+22.4%’, which is fully factual and accurate. Your ‘actual 1% increase’ is a false statement. It’s a 1 percentage point increase, which is completely separate from the regular percantage.
I’m struggling to understand why you think the title is misleading. Could you elaborate on your rationale to help me understand? 🙂
Do you perhaps have an alternative title that you would suggest? Would you be satisfied by something like, for example, “Pornhub saw a 22.4% increase in Linux traffic (from [e.g.] 5% to ~6%) over 2025”?
Sure! As is currently written, it gives the first impression (to me, at least) that the traffic share of Linux has jumped from x% to (x+22)%. Now I understand that this is subjective, but I believe that’s how many people would read it at first glance as well.
Again, there’s nothing technically inaccurate about it, but the 22% number there is imo distracting and tends to lead to misunderstandings. I would personally write it as “Pornhub sees Linux traffic share increase from 5% to 6% (22.4% increase) over 2025”
Well it is an increase of 22,4 percent but at the same time an increase of 1 percentage point. So both are correct. But as we know bigger number more better so thats what we got
Sorry guys, it was just me
/Jk
The Steam Deck can run a browser, right?
Of course, why?
He implying people are using the steam deck to wank.
Is this how the world finds out that it’s finally the year of the Linux desktop?
We’ve got the gooners, we’ve won!!!
Something about porn leading the way, something about DVDs winning, something about VHS winning.
All of that doesn’t matter.
Because Linux desktop (in my experience, KDE Plasma and Wayland) along with distros that do sensible things (I use EndeavourOS btw) are just SO much better that Windows.
I only boot windows for software I have to run windows with fullscreen or GPU based software that doesn’t exist on linuxKDE Rocks
Go install it on old laptops, let people see and donate
Wtf is GNU/Linux? You mean SystemD/KDE?
Why do you think Wayland is better than x11?
Mostly asking from a user experience angle. I know Wayland supports some features x11 doesn’t. What I’ve read also makes x11’s code sound like a big mess, but that doesn’t seem to be a problem for usability.
I’ve struggled a bit with getting games to run after moving to pop os 24.04 from 22.04 and I think the problems are Wayland related for much of it, but I haven’t tried other distros to rule out cosmic.
Eh, we could talk about security and the ancientness of X11, but the fact is wayland is where the dev is happening , you may lag a bit with LTS kernels, but it’ll get there.
Still wish I could cast an apps window to another machine (someone got a way with wayland) but otherwise with a modern kernel it significantly outperforms X. Give Bazzite a whirl, you’ll see.
Wayland is a “new” windowing system so not all software support it, or look the same as on X11.
From what I understand, Wayland will support many new features but is under continuous development.
One of the examples of Wayland modernity is that Waydroid allows users to run Android apps but require Wayland to be able to. It’s kind of in the name I suppose.
You think they’re pleasuring themselves at their desktops?
You aren’t?
How much of that was furry porn?
gay furry porn
All of it.
Yeah, I lost my girlfriend, so … no judging please !
You can use CTRL+R to search you command history. Much faster thst hitting the up arrow. I am sure she will turn up.
Did you look at the last place you saw her?
That’s what he’s doing.
No, the Waffle House bathrooms are closed for cleaning
Sorry everyone, that was me.
Wait no, it was Sims, he already fessed up. Yep totally him and not me.
cool and all but what % of people watch porn on their “big screen”? hard for me to remember that last time I wanked it at a desktop. shit, it might have been at work which would require windows.
Yeah, from my Debian VPN.
It doesn’t work like that. They use the self-reported user agent from the web browser that is requesting the page.
Weird tug of war
Probably some data hoarders scraping that shit
sounds likely, since alot of PH thats been sanatized ends up on non-PH sites.
Would they identify as Linux though and not simply as Windows?
Depends on the default use agent for yt-dlp I guess
Also sometimes websites have a fallback for systems with weaker DRM
Lots of pirating going on…
deleted by creator
