They should be judging her for the open sleeves on the lab coat, that’s not gonna protect you when it splashes back. Not to mention the lack of gloves and eye protection sitting on her head. EHS will have a field day.
Reminds me of an ad for the first Tomb Raider reboot where they show Lara in two different outfits; one that covers most of her skin, and one reminiscent of the OG style, asking “What wlare YOU gonna want to wear in the jungle?”
And I was like “The one that covers more. There’s all kinds of bugs, toxic plants, sharp rocks and pointy sticks. That skimpy little number being given as a preorder bonus ain’t protecting you from shit!”
🤓 Actually, that isn’t mansplaining by definition. Criticizing something that’s directly perceived can never fall under that definition. “Splaining” requires action taken based on an unjustified assumption of ignorance. If you’re criticizing something that’s obviously apparent, there’s no assuming going on.
Mansplaining requires acting on an assumption of ignorance. Acting on an overt display of perceived ignorance (even if the perception is incorrect) can never be mansplaining.
They should be judging her for the open sleeves on the lab coat, that’s not gonna protect you when it splashes back. Not to mention the lack of gloves and eye protection sitting on her head. EHS will have a field day.
Or maybe this MicroAggressions Killer product is completely harmless to her in this fictional comic.
Reminds me of an ad for the first Tomb Raider reboot where they show Lara in two different outfits; one that covers most of her skin, and one reminiscent of the OG style, asking “What wlare YOU gonna want to wear in the jungle?”
And I was like “The one that covers more. There’s all kinds of bugs, toxic plants, sharp rocks and pointy sticks. That skimpy little number being given as a preorder bonus ain’t protecting you from shit!”
Yeah but then she wouldn’t look as good and they wouldn’t get to pull it off with a straight face
Thanks for mansplaining.
🤓 Actually, that isn’t mansplaining by definition. Criticizing something that’s directly perceived can never fall under that definition. “Splaining” requires action taken based on an unjustified assumption of ignorance. If you’re criticizing something that’s obviously apparent, there’s no assuming going on.
Thanks for mansplaining mansplaining
Mansplaining requires acting on an assumption of ignorance. Acting on an overt display of perceived ignorance (even if the perception is incorrect) can never be mansplaining.