• ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Chat Control is not implementing mass surveillance and has nothing to do with national security. I that’s their only argument they are confused and there’s nothing to talk about. If they have other arguments I would like to hear them.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It likely is not their only grievance as other things exist like porn blocking, ID implementations and VPN discussions.

      Also chat control is reviewing private conversations. It is a provacy breach. There is no circumstance where this is not abusable. Here are some truths to how the law is presented:

      1: nothing can be seen, only if certain pre registered files are recognised 2: politicians, military and associated personnel are exempted.

      Meaning it can see more than nothing or else it is acceptable for these people to possess these materials.

      It is also able to controlled a granular level person to person.

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Porn blocking? In EU? I heard about it only in UK. Which EU countries block porn?

        ID implementation… yes, all EU countries have ID. Many have digital IDs. What’s with it?

        VPN discussion isn’t really proof of anything. Even Chat Control 2.0 isn’t approved yet, it’s just a project. VPN blocking is not even a proposal. It just someone mentioned in some report. Hardly a reason to claim that EU is becoming a surveillance state.