• Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m gonna say something bold:

    Surprisingly not a problem for some shows, good example is Simpson golden age.

    There is a gay episode but it’s mostly about Homer overreacting.

    A lot of the satire of Simpson is trying to be functional in a dysfunctional system, which has aged like the greatest wine that frank grimes can’t afford.

    • Goatboy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I think a lot of the time it’s Gen Z not understanding context. There was overt racism, but a lot of media that is considered racist now was either depicting the experience of people at the time or making fun of racists.

      • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        I’d say that’s mostly true for comedy. But some of the earlier stuff was definitely like “point and laugh at this race”. Like the original looney tunes and stuff had some that were rough. They got better about it later but those early episodes had a few that were a little…close lol

      • presoak@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        Well Gen Z is quite young. Children understand trigger-words more, subtle context less so.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We can put King of the Hill in that camp as well I think.

      I think it’s a better and more rounded show than any of them.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I feel like every time I tried watching Big Bang Theory, I got this vibe.

    “haha that guy is such a fucking nerd!” was virtually every laugh-track riddled joke.

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 hours ago

      He said hello hahahahhahahaa…hahahahahaha omg omg bro omg he said- he said hahaha he said HELLO hahahaha

    • Deceptichum@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Hey that’s not fair to BBB, half of those jokes were “Sheldon is neurodiverse”

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I wish I could get people to care about health care and wages as much as they care about mean words. So many seemingly don’t mind being robbed blind as long as our ruling parties using the correct terminology.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I have collected so many of the movies I remember fondly as a Gen X’er. From the ‘70s to the ‘90s. Holy shit the stuff I’d forgotten that was in them. Rape-y stuff, comments about underage girls and basically leering at them with tbe camera, suicides, misogyny, women as sexual objects and nothing else, racism… It’s bad. I’d started a movie or two with my kids and had a “oh no” moment when a part started that I’d completely forgotten about. Some of that still exists, but it’s there as a narrative and plot point about the character doing the shitty things rather than the casual and institutional way it was played before. Just goes to show you how times and people (can; some don’t) change. Some of that stuff was not unusual in life for me back then, I wouldn’t dream of it today.

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah I was pretty sure the key master/gatekeeper stuff would go over my kids’ heads but I forgot about the ghost-sex scene.

      Ironically, other stuff with a high rating is actually due to blood/gore but the other content is pretty low-key. I’d rather they watch Terminator than a lot of the “funny” stuff

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        What we consider funny has shifted quite a bit, at least publicly and for decent people. There are still plenty who are perfectly fine with lowbrow racism and all that as far as what constitutes humor.

  • dewritoninja@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The whole Futurama episode where bender medically transitions to win in the robot Olympics. Huge yikes

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Early 2000s entertainment too. A good portion of the edgy jokes could be considered funny because they were made on the assumption that “We can laugh about this, because we all know racism and sexism is bad, right?”.

    And then 2015ish happened and it became obvious that a lot of people weren’t laughing AT the -isms but rather WITH.

    EDIT: Which slur did Ross use, BTW? I haven’t watched that show in eons, and I don’t remember any.

  • frog@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Seinfeld is in the top of my list. Kramer can show up in black face and they left the episode in but someone can’t be a dark elf in Community.

    They also had Kramer making the Native American noises and stomping the Puerto Rican flag. Basically anything racist, they had the racist guy do. And it was okay because he looked like he had mental health issues.

    • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      That flag episode the joke was that everything he was doing was taken the wrong way. He had accidentally set on fire a flag that was behind him and tried to put out the fire, then someone shouts “Hey, there’s a guy stomping the Puerto Rican flag!” and he is chased by a mob…

      It’s like that Monk episode where he has to shake hands with a lot of people from a group and the last one is black, and right after shaking hands with the black person he cleans his hands with rubbing alcohol, so everyone thinks he is racist and everything he does in the episode just makes him look even worse - because it was taken out of context (he is a germophobe, he cleans his hands with rubbing alcohol after touching anything and anyone).

      • frog@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The episode where he was in black face was also Kramer having an “accident”. Kramer is a device the writers’ had to make racist jokes.

        If you want to do something racist just go backwards. For example, “Let’s have Kramer be in black face during a Martin Luther King walk! It’s okay becuse he didn’t do it on purpose!”

        The writers created the situation. You can’t just say anything was accidental. That’s like those comedians that just keep saying, “It’s just a joke.” I mean look at Michael Richards’ infamous standup. Perfect example.

        • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I don’t think I watched the blackface episode, but if it was an accident that caused a misunderstanding (basic comedy trope) the joke was on people being over sensitive and raging without knowing and/or purposely ignoring context of a situation (I could as easily say “if you want to do something racist, just claim it was a dark elf”). What was being criticized there became the norm, and the consequences are in this thread - people can’t say the name of that Agatha Christie’s work in the comments, nor you can have a dark elf in Community, because context doesn’t matter.

          • nexguy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 hours ago

            If i remember Cramer accidentally had to much tanning spray on his face(and didn’t look in the mirror I think) or something like that then went to meet his girlfriends black family.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The entire point of a reality sitcom is that it takes place in reality.

      Reality has racists. Racism is part of life. There is a difference between a racist character doing a bit because that is what the character would do. Vs a show that is racist because the writers and directors are racist.

      Comedy has done dark humor and racist humor for 1000 years. If you stop allowing it, then you unironically actually just empower actual racists because your now removing a tool to undermine the racism.

      Yeah it sucks when the racist joke or bit is done poorly and lacks the context or nuance to either shine a light on a problem, subvert expections or point out a flaw in society. Thus coming across as just crass.

      But not every attempt is going to land.

      • frog@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I agree with you. I don’t believe in canceling shows. That why I don’t think removing the dark elf episode on Community should have been allowed.

        But at the same time as allowing what was considered socially acceptable, I should be able to express my discomfort with content.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        This is the point cancel culture misses (and I absolutely support some cancellations).

        Throwing it back even further, Blazing Saddles is a great example of a writer/director and some of the best comedy actors of all time using racism to undermine racism.

  • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    And transphobic episodes of Family Guy and NCIS where Glenn’s ‘dad’ is a woman and Tony finds out on a date that she’s ‘a man’ and is speechless, disgusted and coworkers jibe him for it

      • Hypnotoad_@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        The ending scene is so rough these days. Kills the movie for me. The premise is “trans is disgusting” which is so much different than, say, the situation with Kramer stomping the Puerto Rican flag as an accident and being perceived as a racist. Context matters. And Ace Ventura really aged like milk.

        • RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          The joke isn’t so much that ‘trans is gross’ but that he thought he was kissing a girl but kissed a man instead? And then he completely overreacted. Used a plunger on his face, which is obviously grosser than kissing a man. That’s the joke.

          • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Also, the implication at the end is that she had been fooling around with many of them and they were all just realising her gun wasn’t digging into their hips either. It’s not just recoiling at the thought of a trans-gender person.

            In real life, it’s normal to not ‘surprise’ someone with your gender. They should know full well and be accepting of what they are going to find long before it is revealed.

            Of course writing her as having tried to trick most of the police force with her gender is for sure demonizing trans, and was also a ‘fear’ at the time. Like somehow trans people are doing it to ruin other peoples lives, instead of stop their own from being ruined.

            Outside of that, it was the normal overblown reaction to homosexuality that was common at the time. Just in real-life cartoon style, which was Jim Carreys shtick. Plunger to the face is very much how a cartoon character would try to clean something off their face. Except it would probably pull their whole face off leaving it blank and they’d have a floating pencil draw a fresh one on.

        • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Well, specifically the plot is that she was gender surprising everyone on the force. The ending reveals that her gun had dug into everyones hip at one point it would seem.

          Writing her as that kind of person is definitely demonizing trans, but their reactions were the normal overblown homophobia of the time. Not trans specific. It wasn’t just the idea of her being trans causing the reaction.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I legitimately just went “Ace Ventura’s plot was transphobic? Ace Ventura had a plot? Oh yeah! Oh, yeah.”

        My memory of Ace Ventura has boiled down to a few quick catchphrases and sight gags, I almost forgot it was a movie.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      70/80’s were a period of time right after the civil rights movement, so they had to acknowledge racism existence as material. 90/00’s try and pretend that they live in a post racial landscape while the world still very structurally racist (I mean look at Clinton and the crime bill for the quintessential example).

      If you were closer to the civil rights movement you had to engage with the fact that racism was real, and mockery contempt, absurdist, reductionist approaches work well for that

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I like to watch BBC archive videos from the 60s-80s, and so much of it is relatable to today: angst about Russia, the US, China; cost of housing, and groceries; the horrible job landscape; government overreach and under-regulation

      I really think that we as a species havent changed that much over the last 10,000 years

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Depends on what it was. Episodes of forward-looking shows like Star Trek or other series that tackled social issues in episodes are going to be wildly different than something like Revenge of the Nerds.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.auOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think because we expect so much of that to be horrible, that when it isn’t we are pleasantly surprised.

      • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        yeah, for sure the breaking of expectations is a big part of it.

        but i’ve also seen some stuff that would be denounced by the right as “DEI woke nonsense” even by today’s standards

  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I had a hardcover book sitting on my shelf. Got it at a yard sale a while back. “The 13 Crimes of Science Fiction,” it was published in 1979 and most of the stories are much older.

    The level of racism was pretty amazing. One story referred to a mugger as a ‘black buck’ Another was set centuries in the future and had an anthropologist keeping some ‘primitive’ people in high tech chains and cages.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Agatha Christie is probably one of the most popular writers of the 20th Century, and one of her classics is now published under the title “And Then, There Were None.”

      If you’ve ever seen a movie, play, or game where a group of people are invited to a house only to be killed off one by one, you’ve seen something influenced by “And Then, There Were None”.

      Generally the victims are symbolized by figurines on the mantelpiece which get gradually destroyed one by one as the murders progress, eventually leaving “none”.

      The previously published title was the incredibly culturally insensitive “Ten Little Indians”, and the figurines were just that.

      The original published title, in the UK, in 1939 - an era when we DID IN FACT KNOW BETTER was “Ten Little removeds”.

      They did not change the title in the UK until 1985(!)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_Then_There_Were_None

      • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Worth noting that the original n-word version is the title was taken from a popular song at the time the book was published.

        I point this out to demonstrate that this book title wasn’t a weird cultural aberration, it was plugging directly into popular culture of its era.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          In Hungarian, it’s still “Tíz kicsi néger”, though “néger” does not carry the same connotation in the language, if anything, it’s archaic.

          You can be a mainstream politician and say it on live TV, and people will at most laugh at the old person.

          Our version of the n-word is spelled the same.

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Is quoting Wikipedia now banned on Lemmy? I was under impression arsehole censoring mods here were mostly focused on removing mentions of Israeli genocide of Palestinians.

            • FelixCress@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              There you go. This censorship is getting ridiculous. Next time people born in Fucking, Austria won’t be able to explain where they are from.

              • chloroken@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Chuds not being able to post the N word for a day — challenge level: impossible.

                Like, we all knew what the book was, but it was still SO important for you to post this. It was life or death for you. Not saying slurs physically makes your skin crawl. You cannot help but be a racist sack of shit.

                I would personally send you to the gulag.

            • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 hours ago

              10 little subsets of the the human species with really high level of melanin in their skin.

              the screenshot is hosted on imgur.com, do you generally have problems with that one? it was just a screenshot of mentioned wiki article.

              • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Got you. Imgur is now completely blocked in the UK after the “Online Safety Act”, “to protect the children”, because maybe one of the pictures hosted on it is some boobs or something?

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Lemmy admins can create word filters. They replace words with removed when you use a word in the filter.

          Most admins only add slurs and other nasty things. In this case we’re talking about the N word, hard R.

        • FlordaMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It’s automated. Instances can setup a list of words that will automatically get removed. Has nothing to do where it comes from.

          Also, jordanlund is a mod himself, so…

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Bots will automatically remove certain words regardless of context.

          I used to see this all the time in the old Sega game “Phantasy Star Online” where objectionable chat was replaced with “*”.

          So “Nice shoes!” became “Nice s****!”

          You couldn’t arrange to play a game on “Sa****ay”.

          And god help you if you lived in a “ba*****t”.

      • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That book was translated to Finnish in 1940 with name “eikä yksikään pelastunut” (and no one survived), and it was renamed to literal translation to the ten little nwords in 1968!!! Until in 2003 they changed it back to the original

    • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      What’s wrong with the last one? Seems like a pretty standard critique of “science” as evil destroying humanity. In Brave New World they had reservations for the savages who still had religious beliefs, and it was a touristic attraction.

  • Janx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “We made a joke about how the main character should date people of their own gender, which is very, very funny!”

    Typical 90’s experience…

    • Saapas@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m wondering too. I saw an article saying that he said Rachel was a hermaphrodite but I dunno if that’s it

      • Cardinalis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It was Brad Pitt’s character in a Thanksgiving episode, but Ross, as member of the “I hate Rachel” club help spread the rumour in high school to stop jocks dating her.

        I’d argue their intent was malicious, but not outside the norms for 80’s high school kids.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Any term is offensive if it’s used with malicious intent.

          But people forget about the malicious intent part a lot.

          • jaybone@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            But does that “malicious intent” apply to staged comedy?

            I would think the term used is offensive, not the contrived intent.

            • vrek@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              I 100% disagree. If I say “go back to your station, you cogswallow” that could be offensive. You should be offended by that. If I say “haha, you cogswallow, that’s an amazing painting” its no longer offensive. I am showing appreciation of your painting.

              What does cogswallow mean? I have no idea, I just made it up.

              I don’t know any other languages but if someone is insulting me in French or praising me in French I could tell the difference based on context and body language. Did they just catch me stealing an apple? Did they just watch a presentation I did with a smile on their face?

              Words are used to express an emotion. The emotion is what matters. Back decades ago retard wasn’t an offensive term, it was used to describe people with a specific condition. It was used because “imbecile” and “invalid” were seen as offensive. Yes, some people have severely limited mental capabilities. Sometimes combined with limited physical capabilities. We need a word to express I mean them. That could be “flogtrough”. I could offend you with that word or I could praise you. I just made it up.

              I will say in text communication like commonly used on the internet it’s hard to express context so people rely on previous context of usage of that word. If a person has been exposed to cogswallow or flogtrough previously, first get out of my brain, but seriously that impacts their interpretation of the word relative to given context.

            • village604@adultswim.fan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              No, that’s what I was meaning. People ignoring intent is an issue.

              When offensive viewpoints are used in comedy it’s almost always with the intent that you laugh at the person with the offensive viewpoint.

  • RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Comedies are supposed to be edgy. Things age differently. There would be no comedy if you weren’t allowed to make edgy jokes.

    If you were offended by Ross making up a rumor about Rachel, then wow I can’t imagine how you’d feel about Archie Bunker. Or Eric Cartman. Or literally any comedy ever?