• bearboiblake@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    You do not improve a person’s life by removing that person’s freedom, is my point. There aren’t any teenage billionaires…?

    • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      You ever notice how no one ever recommends doing things that are empowering even when the data says they actually do protect children? Only ever restrictions?

      • bearboiblake@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The domination of children is fundamental for conservatism. Even leftists and liberals have been brainwashed into thinking the “traditional” family unit is a good, natural thing, when it is very clearly a vehicle for child abuse.

        The Epstein class don’t give even a little bit of a shit about protecting kids, of course they don’t, they want to exploit them. The fact that the mainstream is actually buying into these lies is depressing. Everyone is accepting it with very little evidence.

        A classic way of knowing your biases is to know what you’ll accept without evidence.

    • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      My point is you vastly improve others’ lives. You reduce the ceiling of freedom for everyone but increase the baseline freedom everyone experiences

      • bearboiblake@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        How is this even slightly relevant to the topic? Whose life are you improving by taking away the freedom of young people?