• ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Critical Role could always licence another official D&D game with Hasbro…but my Insight check’s telling me that they might try and spin up something out of Daggerheart.

    Eh, I hope not. I’m not really liking what I see in Daggerheart’s hope/fear system and how it interferes with initiative, especially. Plus it reminds me of that subplot from Donnie Darko.

    It’s already a game that uses cards, after all, and I can very easily see its systems making for a solid turn-based tactics game. Or maybe they’re not gonna start small, and just barrel full steam ahead into an ambitious CRPG

    I’ll bet you can make a small CRPG for the cost of what their merch store brings in in a year, akin to the Kickstarter era from a decade ago, and that’s if they want to be cautious with their spending. Given the layoffs of the past two years, they’ve likely had their pick of any talent they wanted to hire to realize whatever it is they’re building.

    • jonathan@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Larian told Hasbro to fuck off for a BG3 DLC and/or sequel, so there’s definitely an opening for someone to pick up that torch. That said, I also think they’ll go with their own system and brand.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Larian told Hasbro to fuck off for a BG3 DLC and/or sequel

        That’s definitely not how I’ve ever seen it framed.

        I think Critical Role has an incentive to use their own system, but it’s not one that I’m excited about.

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s exactly how they framed it. They cited reasons as worker burnout and Hasbro / the game system. They wanted to be done with BG3. Studios don’t really announce that the second they finish the game.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    It feels like this has disaster written all over it.

    Sorry if I’m harshing anyone’s vibe, but I can’t escape the feeling that a group of people whose main involvement in the games industry is as voice talent are basically saying “How hard could it be?” and not understanding that the answer is “Very.”

    Ideally they would team up with an experienced studio to build something off of their creative ideas. But if they try to do this whole thing themselves, it has the makings of a Wha Happen? episode all over it.

    Maybe it’ll work. They pulled off Vox Machina, so who knows. I’d certainly like to be wrong. But I can’t help but feel like we’ll all be talking about the fallout from this in five years, when eager backers are still waiting for the game they were promised.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      What backers? Did they say it was kickstarted anywhere? I think they’ve got their own funding sources at this point.

  • kyle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m interested but not especially optimistic. Depends on who is actually making the game, I believe they know tabletop games well, but that doesn’t necessarily translate to a CRPG.

    Random aside, the article says Marisha Ray voiced Jaina Proudmoore, but it was really Laura Bailey.