• febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    If artificial intelligence can be trained on stolen information, then so should be “natural” intelligence.

    Oh, wait. One is owned by oligarchs raking in billions, the other just serves the plebs.

  • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    40 minutes ago

    I hope generative AI obliterates copyright. I hope that its destruction is so thorough that we either forget it ever existed or we talk about it in disgust as something that only existed in stupider times.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      Interesting take. I’m not opposed, but I feel like the necessary reverse engineering skill base won’t ramp up enough to deal with SAS and holomorphic encryption. So, in a world without copyright, you might be able to analog hole whatever non-interactibe media you want, but software piracy will be rendered impossible at the end of the escalation of hostilities.

      Copyright is an unnatural, authoritarian-imposed monopoly. I doubt it will last forever.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Come on guys, his company is only worth $157 billion.

    Of course he can’t pay for content he needs for his automated bullshit machine. He’s not made of money!

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I need a seamstress AI to take over 10 million seamstress robots so I don’t have to pay 100million seamstresses for fruit of the loom underwear… Could you tech it how to do double well and then back up at each end with some zigzags? For free? I mean everyone knows zigzag!

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Sounds like another way of saying “there actually isn’t a profitable business in this.”

    But since we live in crazy world, once he gets his exemption to copyright laws for AI, someone needs to come up with a good self hosted AI toolset that makes it legal for the average person to pirate stuff at scale as well.

  • graff@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If training an ai on copyrighted material is fair use, then piracy is archiving

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Sadly this comes down to OpenAI petitioning Trump, and expecting trump to do anything that could stop a scam like AI is pointless.

  • Lyooth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So all I need to do if I get caught torrenting a movie is say that im training an LLM for subtitles?