• arsCynic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    People see what they want to see? I’ve seen content I don’t agree with on several instances but the main reason I’ve got my main on lemmy.ml over Beehaw is because it annoys me greatly that there’s so often posts I don’t see that are relevant to me or just communities that seem accessible but inactive but are actually blocked without the interface saying so. This spuriously makes it seems as if a community is dead.

    To avoid ambiguity: Trump is a sentient lump of metastatic cancer and many right leaning people are limp-dick insecure ignorant assholes.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Must be exhausting to continously maintain your campaign against .ml

    Why not just block and move on with your life?

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        i blocked the triad of tankies when someone reccomended it a few months ago, plus any conservative ones. and any users trying to infiltrate from those instance into the other ones that defederated with them.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      tankies, the triads of tankies on lemmy. because the left version of MAGA, although they have many parallels of right wings, so basically a mirror version.

      • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Left version of MAGA is when you don’t accept “diversity of opinions” regarding the genocide of Palestinians when you want universal healthcare for everyone, and when primarily you criticize the west as a westerner for engaging in imperialism

        • moderatecentrist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I think it’s right to say that Palestinian civilians should be able to live in peace, and it would good if poorer people can get healthcare. On the point of “imperialism”, would you condemn seemingly imperialist behaviour from countries like Russia and China as much as you would condemn imperialist behaviour from western countries? I see users from Lemmy.ml and Hexbear who defend the behaviour of Russia and China for whatever reason.

          • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Tell me a war in which China has participated over the last 30 years. China simply doesn’t engage in remotely imperialist behaviour compared to the west.

            As for Russia, I wish it was still a socialist country, but unfortunately now it’s another capitalist antidemocratic regime. Surely since you care about Ukraine, you condemn the capitalist regime in Ukraine which led to the defunding of healthcare, education, the removal of guaranteed housing and guaranteed employment, and a massive demographic crisis of loss of life through hunger, crime, drug abuse and lack of healthcare, which killed millions of Ukrainians prematurely?

            • moderatecentrist@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Tell me a war in which China has participated over the last 30 years

              I guess the answer to my question is “no” then…

              China simply doesn’t engage in remotely imperialist behaviour compared to the west

              They’re colonising islands in the South China Sea which other South East Asian countries claim, even though a UN tribunal ruled that China’s claims aren’t valid. Also what should people think of seeming mistreatment of ethnic minorities in China? Of course there are examples of western countries mistreating minorities, e.g. the USA interning Japanese-Americans during WW2. I don’t know if the USA is currently doing anything similar to what is described in the article I just linked to though.

              Surely since you care about Ukraine, you condemn the capitalist regime in Ukraine which led to the defunding of healthcare, education, the removal of guaranteed housing and guaranteed employment, and a massive demographic crisis of loss of life through hunger, crime, drug abuse and lack of healthcare, which killed millions of Ukrainians prematurely?

              Did this happen after the USSR collapsed? I don’t know enough about Ukrainian history to be honest. I do think though that it’s probably a good idea if world borders, such as those of Ukraine currently, aren’t redrawn by force. It’s probably better to settle disputes democratically and diplomatically.

              • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                They’re colonising islands in the South China Sea which other South East Asian countries claim

                Hardly can you call it “colonize” when there isn’t a population in said islands. At any rate it’s much less violent than the poverty and lack of political representation that Puertoricans are imposed by the US.

                mistreatment of ethnic minorities

                Oh wow, a BBC article from 2021. Surely we should trust western state media to tell us unbiased facts about its geopolitical opponents. The BBC has famously avoided the word “genocide” for referring to Gaza over the past years, with scandals coming out of editorial orders of employees to avoid such reporting. Taking the BBC seriously on the mistreatment of Muslims in China is as laughable as taking Russia Today seriously on the mistreatment of ethnic Russians in Donetsk.

                As for the “mistreatment of Uyghur”. I have had this discussion 50 times in Lemmy: bring me a 2022-2025 source with contemporary independent journalistic accounts of generalized mistreatment of Uyghurs. Not a piece written by Radio Free Asia based on “anonymous witnesses”. Not a piece written by Adrian Zenz based on “official government statistics”. Bring me some, any independent journalistic work post-2021 about mass mistreatment of Uyghurs.

                Also, your lack of concern for Ukrainian mass economic and population crisis suggests that your criticism for Russia doesn’t come from a genuine care about the people suffering from the actions of the Russian government, but rather from an agreement with western propaganda.

                • moderatecentrist@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Hardly can you call it “colonize” when there isn’t a population in said islands. At any rate it’s much less violent than the poverty and lack of political representation that Puertoricans are imposed by the US.

                  Whatever you call it, I would still say it’s imperialist behaviour of China to take over islands that it doesn’t seem to have a right to. Regarding Puerto Rico, I think they should have proper representation in the US Congress. Are Puerto Ricans being interned in camps like Uyghurs in Xinjiang though?

                  Taking the BBC seriously on the mistreatment of Muslims in China is as laughable as taking Russia Today seriously on the mistreatment of ethnic Russians in Donetsk.

                  No it isn’t, because RT seems to air lies, while I don’t think the BBC does. For example, RT featured an interview with two Russian military intelligence agents who seemed to have lied to hide the fact that they poisoned Sergei Skripal in England in 2018. Can you provide an example of the BBC doing something like this?

                  any independent journalistic work post-2021 about mass mistreatment of Uyghurs

                  What is wrong with the BBC article I provided? You haven’t shown that the BBC lies or is unreliable. It looks like The Guardian has also reported on this story though and here are articles from Sky News.

                  your lack of concern for Ukrainian mass economic and population crisis

                  I genuinely am just not aware of what you were referring to. Anyway, I hope that Ukrainians and Russians can live in peace, and preferably with political freedom. The first step towards achieving this would be the Kremlin withdrawing their invasion of Ukraine. I think Ukraine should be able to make their own democratic decisions. Ideally every country should be able to make independent democratic decisions I think.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      The ml stands for Marxist-Leninist, and the admin (and creator of Lemmy) named themself after a genocidal warlord

      Edit: only on Lemmy will you find people who read shit like this and say “that’s not a genocide, those women and children deserved to be executed for the crime of being French”

          • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            That doesn’t look like genocide to me because there was a credible threat to their freedom from the white people that benefited from slavery like the teachers, doctors, merchants etc. even if they personally didn’t own slaves there was a clear incentive for them to want to bring back slavery. Also notably white people that fought with them were spared, so it’s not just wantonly killing everyone who is white.

            And even if excessive (which I’m not conceding btw) I’m not gonna blame slaves that had just won their freedom for being overly paranoid and suspicious of the society that enslaved them. This is not like other massacres that are directed at oppressed people to exploit them or steal their land, this is the other way around, the oppressed making sure that there is no trace left of the society that oppressed them.

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              Jesus Christ. I’m talking to someone justifying the slaughter of fucking doctors and teachers and children, and I’m the bad guy in this discussion

              • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I mean if the doctors and teachers are part of a slaver society than I don’t mind the dying. Like who do you think were the people upholding apartheid in south africa for example? Especially doctors, teachers and other such middle class people that benefitted from apartheid but without having to get their hands dirty were the ones handwringing about “civility”. They always have such a nice facade and talk politely but their livelihood built on the back of the labor of the oppressed is very very precious to them and they are for freedom in theory, but don’t want to give up any of their privileges.

                Or as Assata Shakur put it

                As far as I’m concerned, ‘liberal’ is the most meaningless word in the dictionary. History has shown me that as long as some white middle-class people can live high on the hog, take vacations to Europe, send their children to private schools, and reap the benefits of their white skin privilege, then they are ‘liberal’. But when times get hard and money gets tight, they pull off that liberal mask and you think you’re talking to Adolf Hitler. They feel sorry for the so-called underprivileged just as long as they can maintain their own privileges.”

                • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  I mean if the doctors and teachers are part of a slaver society than I don’t mind the dying.

                  Fuck you. Quit running apologetics for genocide. Dessalines did not wait to check if the people he was having raped and murdered played any role in the institution of slavery.

              • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Yes. It’s called colonialism. The ideas of freedom, equality and fraternity were only meant to be for white people. The same progressive revolution wholeheartedly supported the enslavement and murder of millions of Africans in the colonial processes that took place during and after.

                Do you still support the French revolution?

                • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  I don’t necessarily support everything that every French revolutionary did, but I do support beheading monarchs. Given my earlier statement that genocide is indeed always bad, can you guess what my stance is regarding any genocides that any French people were engaged in during the revolution?

                  What you asked was “I take it you condemn the French revolution for abolishing monarchy through guillotines?” The answer is no, I do not condemn the French revolution for that particular thing.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Genocide, believe it or not, is always bad

            People who say this when the president is a democrat are called “tankies” by the pro-genocide center.

            • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              No, Im pretty sure these people pretending to have innocent opinions are pro genocide because they are putting their egos ahead of pragmatism by pretending they don’t understand the immense harm done when they falsely equate both parties just because neither are left leaning.

              Also when they ignore that the only chance of having leftist policies come to life in America is through shifting a winning democrat party over multiple terms in a very boring and not fun at all way rather than a fictional grass roots uprising magically changing the USA, famous for its molasses slow politics, over night.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                “You’re pro-genocide because you’re not as pro-genocide as me!” -every last pro-genocide centrist.

                • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I’m not quite sure I can even begin to follow the logic there.

                  There are 2 realistic options and people pretending there are 3 are choosing the worst of 2.

    • Ibuthyr@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s full of whackjobs that love far-left authoritarian regimes. They’re doing the left a huge disservice because they’re bat shit crazy.

      • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        With claims like this, you make it very easy to dismiss what you’re saying, but given that I kinda can guess what you mean if I give you the biggest benefit of the doubt humanly imaginable, are you referring to the type of people who say shit like “we should form a party” completely oblivious to the way their own politcal system works and the fact that it would only ensure that the only path to escaping the regime was sealed shut?

        • XM34@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, he’s right. I know, it’s hard to believe, but these people really are batshit crazy. We’re talking stetements like “Stalin did nothing wrong”, “China is right in killing the Uigures” and “Ukraine is former UDSSR territory therefore Russia is not invading”.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            “China is right in killing the Uigures”

            If someone says something happened on the fediverse without providing a link, they’re lying.

            • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              That’s an easy position to have except it immediately makes every conversation easy to cohear with sealioning.

              I can understand being skeptical of the other persons summary of sentiment, I am as well, but I don’t think your statement is accurate.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                It’s a mild exaggeration. I sometimes talk about things happening on the fediverse without providing a link, but the difference is, if I’m asked for a link, I can provide one. It isn’t difficult to use the search function, especially if my memory of a conversation is reliable.

                In any case, it’s always best to assume the person is lying if they say something about their opponents’ views that they can’t actually back up. Like, I could say that I had some half-remembered conversation with somebody where they said they like to torture puppies. If you read that, it shouldn’t go into the “maybe” column, it should do into the “false” column. It’s false until it’s validated with evidence, and that’s especially true when evidence should be easy to provide.

                If you treat it as anything but an outright lie, that promotes a culture of making stuff up, because bad actors are fine with getting people to think their opponents “might” torture puppies, and they won’t get called out in that culture. This is how you get crybullies.

                In any case, even if it isn’t an outright lie or bad faith, you can’t rely on people’s memories. Hell, a lot of the time, a person couldn’t even accurately restate the other person’s position during an argument.

                I’ve said this line dozens of times btw (and it’s in my profile). I don’t recall ever being proven wrong, they never have the receipts.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            “China is right in killing the Uigures

            I am in China right now, plan to go back to urumqi in a few weeks, just wanted you to know this is some “Portland is a warzone”-tier deviation from reality. Literally anyone can just go there.

          • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Today I got a “no russia is freeing Ukraine from nazis and the genocide that Ukraine was doing to russia” some fucking how lol

            • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              You could check the MeanwhileOnGrad community that documents every bit of it, but your instance admins blocked it on your instance to keep you all in the dark and shield themselves from accountability. You’ll have to view it from a different instance.

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Isn’t that com run by an actual fascist? Funny how “anti-authoritarians” always seem to just mean “anti-communist”

              • Oppopity@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                Popped over and saw a post saying a user was praising the Uyghur genocide. Read the post and instead it was a guy saying that China was successfully deradicalising terrorists…

                So yeah. No ones saying “I love that China is genociding muslims!”

                • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  22 hours ago

                  Hey look everyone! It’s a .ml user using a single example to serve as proof that the well-documented dumbassery of .ml is all just made up. Or you know, their MO for all disagreements.

  • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    Every time I see an anti-.ml meme I wonder, why are people so worried about people seeing .ml content? If they’re jerks, wouldn’t you want people to stumble into .ml and find out?

    • Zozano@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I can’t tell whether a meme featuring a character from a Chinese game company is part of the joke or coincidental.

      Either way, I upvote for Silver Wife.

        • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s great for you, you can enjoy your commie and anarchy. I’m just gunna chill over here.

    • JesusChristLover420@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      3 days ago

      Lemmy.ml is the devil tempting good leftists to sin. They pretend to be leftists, but the admins are transphobic. It’s a trap designed to trick leftists into supporting transphobia. That way they won’t get to go to heaven.

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    A snake, a cat, a living toxic ball full of venom …and a puffer fish.

    • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I am American and say .ml is the perfect representation of the American population.

      Is it sarcasm?

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        nope, it would be center-right wing with a dash of "further right, but not maga right as a whole. is representative of america, ultra-left wing is a very small minority often with a younger population that isnt cognizant of history of "left leaning governments’, decades of anti-communist propaganda see to that a left leaning party never has power.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not at all. The only group I have ever seen that is as toxic as .ML was The Donald on Reddit. The Mods and users are literal propaganda machines and they all have alts and abuse the shit out of everyone who doesn’t boot lick authoritarians.

        I honestly believe they are no different than the Alt-right. Maybe it is one of those horse shoe things, but more likely they are just disingenuous conservatives.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          more a horseshoe thing. Once someone gets so authoritarian, there’s kinda’ no point in even looking for differences. They’re both interested in tasting boot, so fuck 'em both.

        • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Id bet disingenuous conservatives from other cultures mixed in with useful idiot Americans.

          Americans have a tendency to think the entire world is just McDonalds after McDonalds. There are millions of people on this earth that dont see things the way Americans do and the internet has no boarders.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Doesn’t that mean you want to forcibly cease people’s property at gun point and shoot them if they try to stop you? That sounds pretty fucking tankie to me.

    • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Tell me one (1) successful socialist revolution you support

      Or, better, do you support the Spanish Civil War anarchists (who lost to fascism) more than the Bolsheviks (who won)?

    • w3ird_sloth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Anarcho communism…anarchosyndicalism…Christ I wanna take all these obfuscations, crumple them into a ball of just plain anarchy, and burn it. No offense of course!

      • ThunderQueen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, it just helps filter the madness. Anarcho capitalists still consider themselves anarchists even tough they ae fucking stupid

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          As a side note, I’ve only done very little Wikipedia level reading on anarchocommunism, and as much as I also believe people help each other willingly, I’ve yet to hear a good defence on how it would be possible with the massive populations we have now, as opposed to pre-history.

          It’s all well and good that there are federated groups, with free association, but this is fundamentally ignoring that not all regions are equally blessed in resources.

          If you have money, well then you need a centralised or decentralised way of miniting the money.

          If you don’t have money, well, I don’t think it’s much of a stretch to think that people will want to take care more of the people immediately around them, rather than people on the other side of the world, and since we’re not getting together on large scales to make binding decisions, then there’s no way to guarantee that everyone has a fair share.

          I’m not saying that more decentralised government wouldn’t work, but I do remain thoroughly unconvinced that free association of small groups across the entire world, would lead to much equity at all.

          And as much as we may dream, there WILL be dickheads ruining it for the rest of us. Humans are nice, but humans can also be awful. Pretending otherwise is foolish and doomed to failure.

          I’m a socialist, and am very keen to hear your thoughts :)

        • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I really rather not argue with ‘ancaps’, it’s a meme ideology that is completely fine with a dictatorship of capital.

          here’s my favorite writeup from an ‘ancap’ after one such exchange:

          spoiler

          I was beat up by left anarchists in Greece.

          I don’t usually use forums or Reddit, I usually just post comments on Ancap blogs like Molyneux or Cantwell’s blog, but they didn’t seem appropriate places to post my story. So here goes, I just wanted to share this with all of you.

          Nov 3 I flew to Europe for a Eurotrip type tour. Not a guide or packaged deal, just going around by myself. I paid for half of the trip with the wages I earned over the last two years, my dad paid for the other half. I am 19, I guess that is normal starting college and all. (Before that I worked for my dad’s company part time, so I guess you could say he paid for all of it, lol).

          I did France and then Italy and then Greece next. I am an Ancap so I wanted to see anarchists in these places. Yes, I know they are different kinds of “anarchists” and not really full anarchists like us. I went to an anarchist book store in Italy and it had a lot of English books, but no Rothbard or Ancap. Like I said, I expected that, not a surprise.

          I went to Greece, which everyone knows is famous for its revolutionary anarchism, its economic crisis and everything going on right now. Here I found directions for a local anarchist center. I went and didn’t see anybody, but it was covered in graffiti, mostly in Greek so I couldn’t read it. Whatever, I started taking pictures. Then some people came out and confronted me.

          This should have been my first warning sign something was not right, because photography is not a crime. They were not violent, but they were not friendly, like asking who I was, what I wanted. They all spoke good English actually. Not uncommon in Greece. I said I was a tourist and an anarchist and I just wanted to take pictures. Then they got friendly and told me I should have asked first (but pictures are no NAP violation so I don’t know why, but I didn’t say anything) and they invited me inside.

          We hung out for a while and smoked hash (there is no good dank in Europe as you might find out like in Cali, everyone smokes hash with tobacco which isn’t as cool as it sounds). We started talking about politics and anarchism. I was trying to talk about the state, they were like yeah no doubt the state was bad. But they wanted to talk about capitalism, capitalism this and that. This is when we started to get into a debate.

          I told them that what they called capitalism is different from the free market. They said capitalism is free markets. And I said I agreed. That is what I am saying. Real capitalism is free markets. And they said yes, that is what we are trying to get rid of. And I said no, but we don’t even have that right now. We need more free markets. And everyone at the same time was like “nooo” we are anarchists, we are against capitalism. Anarchists oppose capitalism.

          And I said but not anarcho-capitalists. Anarcho-capitalists are the anarchists who support capitalism. I had a fanny pack (yeah, lame I know) for my camera and in that I had this yellow and black bowtie (also super lame, it was a joke but I wasnt wearing it). And I said look, these are the Ancap colors, yellow and black, like versus the communist red and black. Well, these guys had a lot of red and black in the building already so I thought they would get it.

          I think that is when it started to get a really bad vibe, really tense in the air. The free market thing was funny, we disagreed but I think they thought I was just confused. Everyone was uncomfortable now. Then someone said markets wont work with democracy. And I said exactly, that’s it, democracy is against anarchism. And they kind of agreed, and said yes, we don’t have real democracy, just governments, and we needed more democracy. I said no, we need less democracy, democracy is the enemy. And we need to end democracy to have anarchy. Then they were all like “noooo” again. You know that thing people do in groups when everyone all says “nooo” or expresses some disapproval at the same time.

          And one of them said “but we do want to stop democracy” and then they kind of spoke back and forth in Greek. I didn’t really understand it. And they asked me what I meant.

          So I said okay, I had the floor, I was going to tell them about ancapism. And I tried to explain to them some Rothbard and Hoppe. I said the natural order in anarchy is that the best rise to the top, the market picks who is the best. They compete and are peaceful. They said what do we want instead of anarchy. I said we want private owners to own their own land and businesses, and to employ people. They said that is what we have now. I said no, it would be even better. One of the guys said it was like feudalism. And I said it is not feudalism.

          Eventually one of the guys spoke up and I thought he was Greek, but he spoke English perfectly so he may have not been. He said he knew what anarcho-capitalism was and that we were basically fascists. He asked me if I thought everything should be private. And I said yes. And he asked me if I thought people were unequal. And I told him yes. And that not everyone would have equal rights. I said everyone has the right to own property and not be done aggression against. But that not everyone had to be treated equally by the owners. He said what about immigrants and racism. And I said that would not happen in a free market, but yes property owners could be racist if they wanted to. They had to respect property.

          Then he called me a fascist again, and someone else said I was a fascist. And then they basically all started shouting fascist at me, and one of them grabbed me by the wrists. They pulled me out the door, it was up three floors, and basically drug me down the stairs on my back. It hurt really bad and I remember yelling “you’re breaking the NAP” and things like that. “Stop initiating force against me.” Then they kicked me around on the ground in the hallway, before they took my camera and threw me outside. I was crying and stuff, I just sat there. I was in shock because it was so sudden. Looking back there were warning signs though.

          I think they felt bad for me and gave the camera back, but when I looked later they stole the memory card with all of my Greek photos.

          So they initiated force and theft. They broke the NAP. I knew the left anarchists were not real anarchists, but I never knew they would do something that bad.

          I wasnt seriously hurt, just kicked around a little, lots of bruises and little cuts. I am fine guys so don’t worry. Just needed to share.

          • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Molyneux or Cantwell

            I stopped reading here. Molyneux is an open white supremacist; Cantwell is more well-known as “the Crying Nazi”

            Anyone consuming their content regularly and posting to these blogs shares much more ideologically with the Third Reich than they do with any notion of tolerant diverse civil society.

              • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                they’re all like that

                You do understand how tribal and insular this is, and how much you are playing into exactly the us-versuss-them dynamic that you purport to hate?

                • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  just stating my experience with them as I’ve known many over the years, the ones who are actually earnest stop being ancaps/libertarians

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m gonna be honest, kicking the shit out of a nerd because you don’t agree with his words is not as cool as you seem to think.

            Sure he was “wrong,” but did anyone try “please leave, we no longer wish to discuss these matters with you” before jumping to initiating violence? Multiple attackers no less (which would meet the threshold of deadly force in most states, luckily for them not Greece).

            Back in my day children were taught to use their words, but I guess immature adults that are incapable of doing so still have to bully people physically, sucks to suck I guess, get eloquent losers.

              • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                2 days ago

                Ahhh… lemmy.ml; I should have known. An information bubble.

                Yes it feels good an cathartic to hate on people whose ideas are perverse. Let the hate flow through you all you like; it won’t turn you into one of the Good Guys.

                Yes, Nazi ideology needs to be annealed, expunged, eliminated from the world in the same way that, say, chattel slavery (laregly) has been.

                No, that won’t happen by people beating up Nazis.

                Grow up

                • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Yes, Nazi ideology needs to be annealed, expunged, eliminated from the world in the same way that, say, chattel slavery (laregly) has been.

                  what does annealed mean in this usage? I don’t get the metaphor you’re going for because the literal reading to me says you’re saying that it must tempered/softened. I don’t think that’s an appropriate response to Nazis, it’s a very soft connotation.

                  Grow up

                  making fun of libertarians really struck a nerve huh

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                Sure, then again tankies suck but I don’t think people should initiate violence against them for their words, I’ll just argue or cut comtact. Guess that’s what makes me better than you.

                • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  They’re not arguing for racism and capitalism to continue though but you can do what you like and I’ll continue to laugh at the copypasta