• SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Guaranteed this gets hung up in Senate, on Trump’s desk or because of the DOJ’s ‘investigation’ and they try to never release it.

      • 0ops@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That was basically his excuse with his tax returns right? I wouldn’t be shocked in the least if this is his next move

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah but he was lying about that completely, there was no “audit”. He didn’t want people to know how much of a tax cheat he is. Now he has the power (he shouldn’t but sadly does) to start an actual DOJ investigation. We’ll see.

      • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Supposedly the bill is specifically about removing this excuse, because it’s been used in the past with other prominent cases too.

        • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 hours ago

          We all do, I filled mine up and all I won was a lousy covid mask and a gentrified neighborhood I can’t afford to live in anymore.

          • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            and a gentrified neighborhood I can’t afford to live in anymore.

            Gunshots at 2am and random shed fires should make quick work of that problem. I hear those have a way of lowering property value.

            Leaving a few broken down vehicles in your front yard is a more legal way, I guess.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I think it’s more likely that they’ll just release all the files except for those which mention Trump and his allies, or edit out such references and pass it off as the genuine article.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Redacted. Yeah. Bondi will bookend it with “no collusion” so all the MAGA troglodytes can chatter how innocent the demented rapist fraud is.

      • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah, my guess is either they found a different way to never release anything, or they’ll pass some random junk as the files in question. That’s the reason Johnson suddenly changed his mind on allowing the House to do their job, and why Republicans voted yes on the bill.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I did hear an NPR interview with Ro Khanna (member of Congress representing California 17, discharge petition signatory) today, where whether he had concerns about the authenticity of the files to be released, and he did say that he did. When asked further how he could be sure that the files so released are complete and accurate, he said that it would be dumb to attempt a cover-up or incomplete release, because many of the victims’ lawyers have already seen the files and thus would know if the released files are incomplete, inaccurate, or inauthentic.

          That being said, I do not expect Trump and his crack(pot) team of advisers to have the metal acuity to judge the probability of a successful cover-up correctly.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        He will. The wording of the language is that they release anything unclassified… So then Bondi classifies everything.

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          That’ll be tough. It’s likely worded to prevent the release of classification protecting the names of victims or other people involved who aren’t criminally involved, rather than all of it.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      If you’ve seen what was in the last batch of Epstein emails/texts, it shouldn’t be a surprise. That’s the shit they leaked? What are they holding back? My god, how many Obama staffers was Epstein buddies with? How many Israeli MPs? Put the whole of Lower Manhattan and half the Hamptons on the god damned sex offender registry. Dude was everywhere.

      The man is absolutely radioactive. Never even mind the Republicans, there’s zero chance Chuck Schumer wants anything else getting released. Epstein could bring down everyone in DC over 70.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        there’s zero chance Chuck Schumer wants anything else getting released

        His voting says otherwise. What utter bullshit. You can literally say anything about him and then just demand people accept as true. Sound familiar?

        My god, how many Obama staffers was Epstein buddies with?

        Why the fuck would Republicans want to hold that back?

    • Catma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Feels like its the DOJ stopping it due to on going investigations. Its the easiest way for them to show they made a “good faith” effort to get stuff out but showing nothing.