Donald Trump argued that a GOP budget bill should help only Republican states instead of benefiting Democratic governors.

“We’re going to make a couple of tweaks,” Trump said of his “one big beautiful bill” during a Tuesday trip to Capitol Hill. “I mean, we don’t want to benefit Democrat governors, although I would do that if it made it better, but they don’t know what they’re doing.”

“We want to help all the states, but we have governors that are from the Democrat [sic] party, let’s say New York, Illinois, big ones, and let’s say Gavin ‘Newscum,’ who’s done a horrible job in California.”

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      107
      ·
      2 days ago

      Remind me again why some states would want to remain in a union if they aren’t benefiting from the partnership

      • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I realize I’m making some optimistic assumptions about the durability of our election apparatus, but if we can’t get a shift in power at the midterms I suspect the fascist in chief will accelerate his rate of attacks on freedoms and it won’t be long after that. I predict we make it no later than slightly past the midterms before hitting that point unless there’s a big shift on the congressional side of things.

        Not so much because I think people will take to the streets with that in mind, by the way, but because tensions will be so high that somebody somewhere is going to make just the wrong mistake, some people are going to die or get badly hurt, and it’s going to set things off from there.

        • BrinkBreaker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m just so fucking pissed that Trump keeps pulling his fucking punches. He’s made so many missteps only to walk them back at the last minute. Still fucking horrible, still hurting people, but avoiding the vast majority of the actual impact and lethality of his decisions.

          Tariffs being example A, B, C and D.

          I do NOT want prices to skyrocket, I do not want people to suffer, I do not want a fucking civil war. But holy shit. You can’t play stupid chicken as the president and continuously get away with saying “oops” sorry someone else ruined the sick flip I was going to do over and over.

          If he’d been forced to commit, he’d likely already be dead or out of office.

          I’m so fucking exhausted.

          • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I’m so fucking exhausted.

            You and me both. 🫂

            You can’t play stupid chicken as the president and continuously get away with saying “oops” sorry someone else ruined the sick flip I was going to do over and over.

            If you are Trump, for reasons I still cannot fully fathom and which have seriously damaged my view of humanity in general, you can, it seems.

          • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            No, he hasn’t really held back. The worst damage has its effects delayed, but will become apparent within two years: The elimination of food and drug standards, the death of NOAA’s weather services, the destruction of our scientific institutions, cutting of federal workers of every category.

            Our society has been hollowed into a house of cards, and will only require a breeze for everything to fall apart.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        They have said the next civil war we’ll be bloodless if the left allows it. And it seems the left doesn’t even know they are in a civil war.

      • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The civil war has already started- and the “opposition” seems pretty content to spend the first stages allowing MAGA to set up the battlefields and terms of engagement to their liking.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        If there is a civil war, I’m sure the enemies of the US would rejoice. It’s like that onion article that’s like “al queda decides to sit back and watch US destroy itself”.

        But aside from that, I hope the conservatives lose. And I hope after they lose, we learn from history. Don’t just let them come crawling back into power like after the first civil war. The ultra rich and their lackeys need to be removed from power, and kept out.

        Then again, the 14th amendment should disqualify Trump and a bunch of the republicans, and that doesn’t seem to matter.

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Personally, I think a United States that has eliminated the GOP, we would actually be able to reobtain Super Saiyan status among the nations of earth. Our greatest weakness, is that many parts of our governance are dated compared to the institutions of the European Union - we can’t elect many good politicians, rife with corruption, a broken social identity where American cannot be defined, abusive corporations and employers, failing education, the failure of the social contract, ect. For the last 40ish or so years, American has been running on inertia and a big military stick, which masked the erosion of America.

          Fix these things, and suddenly the US might become a genuine super power again.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Fix these things, and suddenly the US might become a genuine super power again.

            It’s going to take a helluva lot longer than “suddenly” for the rest of the world to trust the USA again.

            You fuckwits knew what Trump was and you went and made the same stupid fucking mistake again 4 years later.

            Even if you kick Trump and the MAGAts out, how can we trust that you won’t simply let them seize power again in a couple of years?

            It’s going to take a generation of sane progressive leaders before anyone will start to forgive and forget.

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            The GOP really is the worst of us, and removing it would do wonders. The Democrats aren’t perfect (or even good half the time), but they’re like herpes compared to the gop’s aggressive cancer.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          If there is. There already is. The revolution we’ll be bloodless if the left allows it - Kevin Roberts. Leader of project 2025.

          • blazeknave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I mean… when they stop stealing taxes from the other states and realize how little they produce on their own and how few ports they have on their river ways… They can have a merry brexit all on their own.

      • invertedspear@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’ll be super fucked if we do. If it’s left vs right you’ll have most of the major cities besieged by rural folk. If it’s state on state, Red and blue states both will have to “secure” vast swaths of their populations or suffer constant sabotage.

        This isn’t as easily cut and dry, north vs south, as the US civil war was. Modern civil war would be a hell of destroyed cities and slaughtered or starving innocents. Just look at all current conflicts. You may be tired now, but it’s nothing compared to the reality of what USCWII would be.

        • GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          Closest analogous conflicts I could imagine would be when the us bombed eastern europe. Urban areas would be bereft of food and incoming supplies, rural areas would be bereft of most foods and incoming supplies, and everyone devolves into roving gangs and desperate attempts to fortify an area of ‘trusted’ neighbors.

          Reading the first hand accounts of what people went through is enough to make me horrified whenever anyone talks about the possibility of a civil war with glee. They don’t have the imagination or the knowledge to comprehend what neighbor vs. neighbor really looks like.

          • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Which is why we should all be joining up with supportive local community groups, like, yesterday. Under this administration, one should best assume that there is no official safety net anymore. The dictator-in-chief can sign an executive order and remove everything on a whim.

            We’re going to be reliant on our neighbors in a way we haven’t seen in generations. Get involved and start making connections now. There are organizations across the country that serve their own communities.

            One quick note - be mindful of how those organizations are funded. If they rely on government funding, that means they’re beholden to the government. To this government. Which can choose to withhold funding or to attach ridiculous strings to it. On the other hand, if they’re completely donation-based by the local community, they can remain faithful to their members’ interests and keep running regardless of which politicians are in charge. Just something to keep in mind.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mine pays for a huge number of them. California.

      We’re going to vote on whether we want to seriously pursue succeeding from the US in 2028. If this shit doesn’t stop, I imagine things will slowly fall apart in this country.

      California recently (this year, I believe) became the fourth largest GDP in the world, previously the fifth.

      https://www.sos.ca.gov/administration/news-releases-and-advisories/2025-news-releases-and-advisories/Proposed-Initiative-Enters-Circulation-Requires-Future-Vote-on-Whether-California-Should-Become-Independent-Country

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Technically, it isn’t a vote for secession, but rather a vote for dedicating resources towards researching the option. Which, honestly, would be better IMO. It gives California options, since we don’t exactly know how things will look two-four years from now. We could have AOC sweeping out Trump in a special election, we could have Trump’s parade murdering civilians who block the procession, we simply don’t know.

        So we should all prepare our blue states for the possibility of conflict, be it knowledge, resources, or institution. Hope for the best, expect the worst.

      • themadcodger@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, huh. If half the state participates, and 55% of the participants vote yes, it’ll mean a vote of no confidence in the US, but won’t actually mean secession. It’ll form a commission to study the viability though.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is what always blows my mind. All these states with leadership bitching about mooching off the federal government are exactly the states which mooch off of the federal government, because their states produce literally nothing.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      He’s saying he wants to make that imbalanced dynamic worse than he did last time. It’s a comically nihilistic strategy - or at least, it would be, if I didn’t live in one of the bluest states in the damn country

      • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        A complete restructuring of our educational system at the moment. Right now there’s so many title one schools per state, which receives funding for additional educational assistance for students with low test scores. Money to hire in class para educators and teacher assistance, hell some of the schools in my state, even get money so that we can provide breakfast and lunch for kids who can’t afford it.

        I don’t have hard concrete numbers right now, but the last time I checked Florida was receiving billions of dollars in student money that basically amounted to $2000 per kid in public schools 

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      2 days ago

      The state that contributed the most taxes also elected Gavin Newsom and houses Elon Musk / Peter Thiel.

      They are getting what they deserve.