https://archive.ph/3WZrp

California-based startup Reflect Orbital aims to build a swarm of 4,000 giant mirrors in low Earth orbit to “sell sunlight” to customers at night. Experts warn that the mirrors could mess with telescopes, blind stargazers and impact the environment.

Reflect Orbital, which was founded in 2021, has recently taken the first step in a scheme to sell sunlight at night by bouncing solar rays off giant “reflectors” that can redirect the vital resource almost anywhere on our planet. By doing this, the company aims to extend daylight hours in specific locations, thus allowing paying customers to generate solar power, grow crops and replace urban lighting.

But experts say it is a wildly impractical plan that should never get off the ground. What’s more, the resulting light pollution could devastate ground-based astronomy, distract aircraft pilots and even blind stargazers.

  • Naevermix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is obviously a scam directed at venture capitalists. There’s no way this is going to happen.

  • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    This is not just simple bullshit this is part of a greater Solar Radiation Modification effort and is highly likely to actually become a thing because we are going to block the sun we aren’t going to stop using oil.

  • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I won’t lie, the idea of sunlight on demand sounds interesting… but then capitalism ruins it before the environmentalists even had a chance. (not trying to downplay environmental science here, just being cheeky)

  • axx@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The future we hoped for: Dyson sphere, free unlimited energy

    The future silicon valley shitlords are hoping for: let us sell you sunlight (or maybe lack thereof, wink wink)

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Last time some rich fuck started screwing with people’s access to natural sunlight, it didn’t end well for him.

    Two screenshots from the "Who Shot Mr. Burns" episode of "The Simpsons" showing Mr. Burns with a gunshot wound, and then collapsing onto a sundial.

  • lightsblinken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 hours ago

    please stop fucking with the delicate balance of nature, its the only nature i’ve found that works for me

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They’re not going to reflect sunlight that wouldn’t otherwise hit the planet. This won’t add extra energy to the planet, just move it around a bit.

      • jim3692@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If I understand correctly, those mirrors will reflect sun rays, that would otherwise be wasted across the universe, to earth.

        So, you are fundamentally wrong. The very idea is to reflect sunlight that wouldn’t otherwise hit the planer. This WILL add extra energy to the planet.

        Even if they used sunlight that bounces off earth, they would still cause issues, just a little less serious. This is because they would be trapping energy that tries to leave the earth.

        • MBech@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          They’re supposed to be positioned in low earth orbit. Apart from a very slim belt that light would’ve hit the planet anyway.

      • DarkSurferZA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Are you being serious? I can’t tell, but if you are, that’s not how this works.

        You either steal energy from somewhere/someone to redirect it around the planet where it’s dark, or, you add energy from what is not hitting the planet in the first place.

        You can’t have a situation where you aren’t stealing someone’s sunlight and you aren’t adding sunlight

        • MBech@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Are you serious? Taking energy from one part of the planet and putting it somewhere else isn’t going to make the planet hotter, like the previous commenter stated. Taking water from 1 lake and putting it in a neighboring lake, isn’t going to add or retract from the total water.

          • Brutticus@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 hours ago

            We do take energy from one place and put it in another. In the form of fossil fuels. And we ship it with what energy now?

  • drascus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I just imagine the first places that put in in-door lightnig like “here now you can work later in the day” now they will be like “Oh look you can work 24/7 now it’s never dark anymore”.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      We can already do that. Even outdoors, you put up sports field type lighting.

  • Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Rich people should not have the choice to have fucking sunlight in the middle of the night.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Scientists: One desperate plan we are considering to combat climate change is a series of gigantic mirrors to deflect sunlight away from the planet.

    These assholes: OK, but what if, like, the opposite of that?