TL;DR: Mozilla is killing localization on Support Mozilla, overwriting articles written by humans with machine generated translations. Although Mozilla knows that their AI doesn’t localize or adhere to style guides, Mozilla is going live with it anyway. I thank locale leaders and localizers for their tireless efforts. Locale leaders seem to be obviated by AI, and Mozilla has nothing to say about it.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Sooooo

    Chrome is out

    Firefox is put

    What is a professional Brower that can do all what the above two can do, but is open source and not riddled with adware or ad allow ware, spyware and other shit?

    Is there any browser left that we can still use for all sites?

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I wouldn’t mind donating to have Firefox off of Mozilla’s hands and back into the FOSS sphere where it belongs. Heck i’d even pay a subscription.

    • Hond@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      36 minutes ago

      that tonedeaf response of the mozilla staff boils my blood. holy fuck. i hate mozilla so much for years already but in recent times it got so much worse. cant wait to switch to ladybird or other alternatives in the future.

  • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Why? They have free (as in free beer) volunteers. AI could do translation for pages nobody had time to translate yet but taking over the localization seems unnecessary.

    Edit: Okay it is kinda like that, the bot automatically translates everything but volunteers can still contribute and provide better localization. It just seems to not work that well, overwriting things it should not when the actual work is just translating one additional sentence. Or simply not being that great at localization. In general AI translation is not a terrible idea but this seems clearly half baked and Mozilla has stopped responding to the complaints which isn’t helping either.

    • khaleer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not terrible idea? Did you heard about ai japanase localization disaster?

      • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        I mean yes, that is why I wrote the edit. It does seem like you could do this properly, by allowing AI to do rough translations of new articles and humans do proper localization afterwards. And prevent AI from overwriting localization of text that has not actually been altered in the original language.

  • tyler@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Anytime I see an anti-mozilla article, it’s abundantly clear that it’s an astroturfing campaign to make Firefox look bad. You NEVER see these articles about chrome, brave, opera, etc which are all much much worse.

    • BD89@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The way they are forcing AI on everyone and into every aspect of their browser especially when a large part of the people who use Firefox hates that shit is going to end Firefox.

      The reason you don’t hear it about all those other browsers is because people have always known they don’t give a fuck what the end user wants.

      Firefox used to be different. But all good things deteriorate over time. Watching it happen in real time to a browser we all use and used to love is why you see it so much posted especially in places with like minded individuals like Lemmy.

    • pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This is bullshit. Brave literally have a webpage mentioning their shit. You are trying to gaslight us all.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Calling objections to what some unelected jerks in the foundation (which is a supposedly public organization) are doing is not “anti-Mozilla”. And I would first suspect of astroturfing everyone pretending it is.

      Raising voices and putting pressure about things spoiling something is caring about it. And yes, people who care try to make real effect and not just safely complain to be ignored.

      Mozilla honestly has been becoming worse and worse since Australis.

    • Mikina@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’d say that’s because here on Lemmy, we already don’t give a fuck about and wouldn’t touch Chrome or Edge with a ten foot pole, but some of us trusted Mozzila, which is now starting to do dumb AI shit. And having your trust broken hurts.

      Astroturfing would not be recommending LibreWolf as an alternative.

      If you look into alternatives, Brave is one that’s usually mentioned but there’s always someone quickly posting all of the dumb shit they did.

    • hummingbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      What an odd comparison. What differentiates Mozilla from others is their close relationship with their community. Just read their manifest and you will see Immediately why they are getting flag for humiliating their own supporters.

    • KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Eh, I’m not about to stop using Firefox, but the complaint is valid. They nuked a bunch of work from volunteers without notice in favor of shitty auto translate.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Almost all Microsoft KB articles are machine translated.
      Every time I open a reddit article from a search it attempts to auto-translate which immediately looks and reads very inhuman.

    • yoasif@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah, I am astroturfing. It can’t be that I actually believed Mozilla when they said that localizers were heroic.

    • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      But this is not about Firefox delelopment, but about community getting overthrown for apparently no reason.

    • Engywook@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Lol, bashing that shitty “org” is a civic duty. Fuck Mozilla.

      • pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They like that the money goes to activism on African countries instead of the fcking browser. Just until one year ago they started to work again on features.

        • Engywook@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I left that sinking ship in 2021. Just watching it sink slowly from the river’s edge.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    While what happened in Japan sucks and calls for an apology by Mozilla towards the team, the general idea of machine translation on demand is one of the few working examples of machine learning. I’d recommend professional systems instead of google translate, though.

  • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    9 hours ago

    In all objectivity, this seems like the most rational thing to do.

    Now that you can have good translation by AI, why would anyone want to waste their time on localization?

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Now that you can have good translation by AI,

      I see the bots are commenting on lemmy.

    • fatalicus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The main issue, and this is also mentioned in the blog post, is that the bot only does translation and not localisation.

      The first is just taking the words from one language and changing to another.

      The second is to actually make sure the text in the new language makes proper sense. Maybe the English article uses some analogy that does realy make sense in the new language. Localisation is to find some other suitable analogy to use instead, so that the point from the main article is kept, but it still makes sense.

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I do some volunteer work on localizing for Welsh and some Spanish. AI translations are hot garbage still even for the larger languages like Spanish. You can get a general idea of the intent most of the time, but that’s about it. It’s nowhere near good enough to replace humans with yet, definitely not good enough to overwrite what they’ve already translated.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          It is good, specially on mid size text. But it is not good enough. When text is long or too short, it gets lost and makes tons of context mistakes. It also tends to be unnatural for the target language preferring original language phrasing.

  • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    10 hours ago

    That’s what you get with dozens of new executives and crazy pay packages for the top brass huh?

    I’m losing hope. I might just give in to chromium honestly.

      • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I agree, and I honestly don’t want to go chromium… But Mozilla is making it harder and harder to even want to use their product.

        I’m not getting off Firefox/Floorp yet, but Mozilla needs to stop messing this up so royally at every turn…

      • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Mozilla is turning into the same thing every other big corporations are, including Google. Inflated executive numbers and pay, cutting what made then unique (think of all the FOSS stuff they’ve killed along the way)…

        I’m not jumping to Vivaldi or whatever just yet, but ugh… Their latest push for AI is driving me very close…

        • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 minute ago

          Still doesn’t make sense. One company is turning to AI so that drives you to other companies that already have AI and are precedentally worse?

          I’m not saying Mozilla is a saint. The sooner we can replace the executive branch, the better. But the even better comparative is if somehow we don’t even need to get to that point in the first place, and not supporting Mozilla at the past edge of where they’re at is defo not gonna lead to that.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Aren’t the devs persona non grata for some reason or another?