Go ahead, vote MAGA in the midterms if you’re curious how fucked your life can get.

  • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 minutes ago

    vote MAGA in the midterms

    You’re not in US platform here bud. Most people here already hate the orange turd and his cronies to the max.

    Fix your damned shit, where it matters, not on an international forum who’s tired of your shit.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I worked my ass off. Now I can pay for a place to live and keep paying it off no matter what for 30 years. No matter what? Yeah anything happens to me, that means my family looses their house for life because they are too young to work now but not having a house will make it harder for them to ever get one.

    I’m basically a slave.

    Now if I were to sale my home, then I could probably afford to buy a smaller house and keep paying even more! Yey! That’s how math works right? You get 10 dollars for your house so that you can buy half that house for 11 dollars! Yey!

  • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Hard to work hard when fuckers like him are trying to pay employees even less every year.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    9 hours ago

    He is setting USA up for the worst economic crisis in history.

    The biggest, the best, the most beautiful financial downfall the world has ever seen.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Crashed economies hurt the poor. The rich use their wealth to buy up resources, realestate, stocks, etc. on the cheap and then ride it out in their luxury homes while the rest of us stand in the bread lines.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        What hes aiming for is destabilization.

        He’s already talking civil war.

        Which I think is his ultimate goal. and the goal of his masters.

        Civil War 2 on a horrific scale, that knocks America out of any meaningful global position for years, if not decades afterwards.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It will take a bit more time. Enough time that when the next president steps in, the aftermath will really show. Then this egotistic maniac will point at that president and blame them. Never him fault, according to him.

      But that’s narcissism for you.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I hate him.

    My dream is to be a homeowner and it’s slipping away faster than I can chase after it.

    I fucking hate him so much.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    11 hours ago

    “Who didn’t work very hard”
    Says the obese orange paedo that has never worked a day in his life.
    The only thing this fat tub of corruption ever worked hard at was finding and raping little children. Sweaty cunt.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    242
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Here’s the thing that I think a lot of people don’t understand about home ownership: Housing prices going up is only beneficial if you plan to sell.

    We were (very) lucky and were able to get in on the tail end of the early 2010s housing crisis and leverage the first-time homebuyer incentives that were offered at the time to buy a modest house. It cost $245k. It’s currently worth $550k, and people seem to think this means we made $300k in profit! Yay us! And technically, on paper, sure, we did, but in reality, no.

    Housing prices across the board are up, and we still need a place to live, so if we sold this place, we’d have to buy something else (at the same grossly inflated prices), or we’d have to rent (at grossly inflated prices). If the $550k this place is worth on paper buys us something that would have cost $245k in 2010, we haven’t gained anything.

    Either way, we have no intention of selling, so we will never see a cent of that increased value. What we are seeing, however, is increased property taxes since the property has, on paper, doubled in value.

    What I’m getting at is, this doesn’t benefit homeowners, it benefits housing investors, who are the group Trump really wants to prop up.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Exactly.

      Our home has doubled in value in the last 7 years, but life would be better if it had’ve stayed at the same price.

      We’re lucky enough to have somewhere to live but as a community it really sucks that its so hard for so many people - the rental market is just awful, inhumane even.

      God forbid we want to buy a bigger home with some more room for the kids - upgrading just cost twice as much.

      My parents are boomers and have been beneficiaries of the eternal increase in property values throughout their lives. They’re in their 80s and really need to retire, but can’t really afford to. Increasing property prices aren’t really good for anyone.

    • Dadifer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      137
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You know who it is good for? Boomers who are selling their big houses to go live in a condo or nursing home. Guess who votes for this shit.

        • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          17 hours ago

          We absolutely want to, and if having money was the only barrier to doing so, we’d sell in an instant, but unfortunately it’s simply not an option for a lot of people

          • danekrae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            What’s the plan, if not welcome in the new country? Or it’s invaded by the US?

            • coyootje@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              16 hours ago

              There’s plenty of countries (in Europe or elsewhere) where Americans are still welcome. Here in the Netherlands we have quite a American community and we like having them, as long as they’re not maga crazies.

              • Asafum@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                12 hours ago

                For me it’s not even a matter of who is accepting of Americans, but who will allow me to move there. I’m an “uneducated” factory schmuck and the vast majority of countries have some professional or monetary requirements I can’t meet :(

              • Auli@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                31
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Importing the crazy to your country. Americans are just sick they have their fairy tail founding and the we are the god given people complex.

                • Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  35
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  Overly broad generalizations are not helpful. In any case, the Americans likely to leave are not the idiots who voted the fascists into power.

              • danekrae@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                16 hours ago

                And if the US decides to invade, what will the person I asked the question do?

      • MuskyMelon@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        If no one can afford the boomer homes, the houses stay unsold so there’s a balance when trying to maximise profit.

        • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          16 hours ago

          As mentioned above, that’s fine for investors actually. They don’t want individuals buying homes. They want people renting them. Across a long enough period, renting will be more profitable so they are happy to buy them up even if your average person can’t afford the mortgage.

            • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Boiling frog.

              Remember, when Al Bundy and Homer Simpson showed up, they were considered ‘middle class.’ Homer had a house and two cars, his wife stayed home. That was normal.

              In 1960, minimum wage was $1.00/hour and the average US home was $11,000.00. At that time, $1 million was a vast fortune. Nowadays, $1 million is what a rich guy pays for a party.

              • voracitude@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                A honeycrisp apple costs over two fucking dollars. Five years ago it was fifty cents. Not fifty years ago. Five. Small, but entirely emblematic of the problem.

                • verdigris@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 hours ago

                  Mmm I don’t know about this one, I worked at grocery stores 15 years ago and fancier single apples were around $1.50.

                • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Don’t get me started on luxury inflation.

                  Look at things like the prices for live sporting events and concerts.

                  Back when The Beetles were the hottest band in the world, teenagers were buying their own tickets.

                  Middle class folks used to be able to splurge once in a while and get the best of the best. Now that stuff is beyond the reach of mere mortals

            • maniclucky@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Because the people who don’t accept it don’t have the power to reject it. We are owned by billionaires and our system is corrupt to the fucking core.

            • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              15 hours ago

              It’s really not. The affordability crisis is one of the reasons you’re seeing the unraveling of America to begin with. Americans (myself included), like most other people, are stupid, emotionally driven creatures. They can’t buy a house or afford groceries so they elect a strongman who’s going to get rid of the “other”, because obviously it’s their fault. This is not a uniquely American phenomenon, but in typical American fashion, we’re being pretty extravagant about it. BoJo in the UK, the AfD, Marine Le Pen, it’s a very familiar story and it’s for the same reasons every time. Hitlers rise to power was in part due to a failing economy. The average person legitimately does not understand the factors that give rise to their social and economic situation and is easily manipulated by those with power and money. It may look “acceptable” to us from the outside because we’re not tackling the root of the issue, but most people think they are, they just haven’t actually identified the root issue. People stormed the capital in part because of affordability, they clearly want to do something, they are just too ignorant to understand. Also racism, but that’s a whole different conversation.

            • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              A bunch of Americans are accelerationists in disguise. Such people strongly favor an invasion of Greenland, for instance, since it would greatly advance the accelerationist cause.

        • Dadifer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yes, but when they do they cash out without needing comparable housing. Plus, more of them have finished paying their mortgages, so they can afford to wait.

    • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This is something that has baffled me for a while when I see or hear people talking happily about their home value going up or talking about their house as an investment and get mad at the thought of a drop in home value. Even if these people never sold their house, if home prices keep increasing faster than wages, then at some point they won’t be able to afford the taxes on their home. I just don’t get it, smh.

    • Lexam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Same here. We bought our modest house and have been slowly updating it. But we never plan on moving unless we absolutely have to. So I don’t need or want it to increase in value. The value is it’s my home.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      It doesn’t help home owners, home buyers or even home sellers looking for a lateral move in a new area or an upgrade to a bigger or nicer home. In fact for the latter two, it ultimately hurts them. The people that it helps are those who are looking to downsize their home, move into a nursing home, or move in with their kids. i.e. people old enough to not have kids living with them anymore, retirees, etc. They can sell their 600k home they bought for 80k 40 years ago, pocket all of that or the difference if they buy a smaller home, and use it as a slush fund on top of their social security and 401k to take vacations.

      Meanwhile, their home is bought as an investment property that people like their kids and grandkids will need to rent instead of own, spending more per month than a mortgage would be for the same home, especially as rent increases every year to keep up with the housing market (even though the only costs that go up for the landlord with the market increases is a marginal amount on taxes and cost to buy MORE investment properties), and with the renters gaining no equity for their rent dollars while their landlord profits off of that money instead.

      Hell, not only would lower housing prices mean that more people could become homeowners, or means current homeowners could afford to get a bigger home for their family, or live closer to work, or get a nicer/newer home that isn’t a money pit.

      Raising house prices ONLY benefits the elderly homeowner looking to sell and the landlords looking for more tenants and higher rents. Speaking as a homeowner, for the love of god, bring housing prices down.

    • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      What you do gain is equity. And while that equity can’t be used to pay for a new house, it can be borrowed against cheaply.

      A second mortgage, such as a home equity loan or a home equity line of credit, means you can use some of that value in your house for big purchases or projects without the higher interest rates you would pay for other types of loans or a credit card.

      It’s one of the reasons home ownership is financially superior to renting, even if your monthly payment might not be that different. Owning property has inherent value.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I have a mortgage payment already, and groceries have tripled in what feels like a year and a half. My property taxes went up $200 a MONTH this year. What makes you think I’m in a position to make more fucking payments?

        Equity is a fucking scam, brother.

        • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I agree in general. But it is nice to know there is an option in an emergency (cancer, or totalling a brand new car or something). Cold comfort i know but its not nothing.

        • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          If I had a dollar every time someone said “but you have equity” I’d have the pleasure of slapping someone across the face for a dollar

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Plenty of people in your position fund their retirement off their home equity. It’s called a reverse mortgage. If you don’t have heirs you care about leaving the house to, it’s not a bad way to fund retirement.

      • eli@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Absolutely the biggest scam ever.

        My parents bought their house for $159,000 in the late 90s.

        They are still in that house. Guess how much is left on their mortgage balance? $350,000.

        Why? Because of cash out refinances and HELOCs.

        They should be retiring soon but they’re not, because people like you said these equity loans are good.

        They’re not. These are terrible ideas. Do not EVER take out the equity of your home.

        • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Woof, that sucks. I’m sorry to hear that.

          I’ve never bothered myself. Not enough equity gained in my house and still too much mortgage to pay off. But I know my neighbors have had success with the process, as have my parents.

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      A-fucking-men.
      I’m in a similar boat house. We bought in 2011, used a USDA loan and were able to pick our place up for a song ($160k). It now has a “value” of ~$360k. And all that extra “value” is doing for me is increasing taxes and insurance costs. I’m not planning on selling any time soon, so my home “price” going up is a net negative. Sure, we might sell in a decade or so, but today’s price won’t have a major impact on that.

      What I’m getting at is, this doesn’t benefit homeowners, it benefits housing investors, who are the group Trump really wants to prop up.

      What? You’re telling me the pedophile, racist, Nazi sympathizer, billionare son of a racist, Nazi sympathizer who made the family’s billions by wartime real estate profiteering is more interested in protecting real estate profiteering than helping people? Color me shocked, absolutely shocked, I say. Well, not that shocked.

    • HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Housing in the US is super borked right now. Corpos have been buying properties driving up house prices. Rent rates are crazy high as well There’s not enough affordable places to live.

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I agree. It doesn’t help me that people who work in my town can’t live in my town. It doesn’t help me when taxes go up on my house. I have the same house if prices crash lower than we bought. I have the same house if prices go up.

      In fact - if prices bottom out and we can keep our jobs, maybe I have a better house because maybe we can afford to do some reno that is too expensive right now because housing is so expensive.

      “Didn’t work so hard” WTF? Did Trump work hard? There seems almost no correlation between who works hard and who has money. Some who work hard have money, some don’t. Some who never worked at all have money, some don’t.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Raising house prices do benefit you, if you don’t have kids or don’t otherwise have heirs you want to leave money to. Reverse mortgages exist, and their are millions of baby boomers financing their retirements off of the increases in their home equity.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      There is a use case for house values going up without selling the house…kinda.

      HELOCs are a great option for low interest credit, using your house’s equity for collateral. Higher value = more equity = more collateral = higher credit line.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Housing prices going up mostly benefits real estate agents.

      As a home owner I don’t really care if my house goes up in value. I don’t include it in my net worth (even though it’s paid off).

  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s OK guys, I’m planning on buying a home later this year. Knowing my luck, property values should plummet sharply shortly after I do that.

        • matlag@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          And the income follows somewhat inflation, otherwise you’ll need 600% of your income to barely afford one meal per day, and you won’t have anything left for the house.

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’d bet on stagflation actually:

          Stagflation is an economic condition characterized by the simultaneous occurrence of high inflation, stagnant economic growth, and elevated unemployment.

          • jacksilver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            34 minutes ago

            Yeah, given seems Trump hell bent on devaluing the dollar and destroying global trade, stagflation seems most likely.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    vote MAGA in the midterms if you’re curious how fucked your life can get.

    Or don’t vote. Again. Either will have the same effect.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    LOL, I cannot wait until I have my next IRL conversations with the more-leftist-than-thou dumbasses that sat out or voted third party and the Enlightened Centrists that voted for Taco because they fell for the right wing/Russian agitprop that Biden’s economy was so terrible and/or that Kamala was genocidal and/or something something “gerontocracy”.

    JFC.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Maybe you should devote that energy toward more constructive organization efforts within your party, or good faith gestures that build trust and solidarity with new allies? As someone who did hold his nose and voted for the uninspiring, inept Democrat pick who went on to eat shit I have to say this preoccupation with rubbing your party’s failure in the face of anyone you failed to reach is… Not inspiring, to put it charitably.

      • DoctorGirthquake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Yes, not inspiring and entirely unproductive. Demonizing and pushing those who didn’t vote blue further to the right isn’t helpful, and I’m not saying “both sides are bad” or that we have to compromise with Republicans (I voted for Kamala too).

        As fucked as things are, we can either whine about not getting our way until the end of time, or we can do something about it. Comments like OPs push the needle in the wrong direction.

        • AlexLost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Sadly, I’m pretty convinced if Kamala was Male they would currently be president. Trump has only ever beaten a woman, in a race… Or whatever

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Voting for Kamala was the only sane move. That’s all we were asking for.

        We all want Bernie, but the nation is what it is and we’d have been streets ahead with Kamala even. Hopefully AOC someday.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        LOL, you must not have much dealings with the type I’m talking about. They are rubbing their high-horse ideals in my face all the time, saying that Taco is more or less the same as Kamala would have been.

    • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Ah yes waste time blaming people who were actually trying to move the needle back to the left but were roundly ignored by a bunch of geriatric genociders who would rather pander to racists and ignoramuses who would never vote for them in the first place than just idk maybe stop committing genocide.

      This will totally get those people to vote for the other milque toast white racist that the dems put up as a candidate without any sort of election and just expect everyone to vote for because “at least theyre not trump” without actually having any policy that differs from republicans in any sort of meaningful way.

      • notabot@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        without actually having any policy that differs from republicans in any sort of meaningful way.

        For all that the dems really do seem to do their best to alienate the left, I’m fairly sure their policy did not include having barely trained, masked, goons running around American cites executing people at will, kidnapping others, and facing no concequences, and yet, trump was clear that it was what he wanted. I’d call that a meaningful difference.

      • GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’ve been struggling with this for a while. I can understand and respect the moral dilemma that comes with participating in elections. I think, though, too many people look at it in a black and white lens that creates blinders.

        I’ve never in my life voted for a candidate that I agreed with on everything. Yes, the moral importance of some issues weigh far heavier than others, but the ultimate goal is to do the least bad. I will continue to vote for the candidates I believe offer the most harm reduction if voting is available to me, because these are the options I have to work with. We have to make decisions in the moment that reflect the reality of where we’re at.

        We’re living through the consequences of inaction that presents itself as protest. Had Kamala won, do we think we’d be seeing the absolute fucking insanity we’ve found ourselves in right now? I’m glad this moment is pushing more and more people to action and resistance, but at what cost? People are being disappeared, deported, and murdered in the streets by our government right now. And Gazans certainly haven’t benefitted from the current administration. This is a level of bad I never expected to see in my life, and I think there are a lot of terminally online people who are seeing this in a romanticized way that obscures the severity of the situation we find ourselves in.

        We likely would have had more ability to push things to the left without the levels of harm, destruction, and violence that we’re seeing now under just about anyone but Trump and Project 2025. Instead of activism and outreach, now we have to play defense and protect our neighbors and communities. Not to mention the roll acks of rights to the health and safety of women and queer people are more passively costing lives and creating suffering.

        Yes, the status quo was terrible. Democrats offer pretty words and little action. They aren’t going to save us or give us the futures we deserve. I’d give just about anything for us to be out of this, though. Humiliation and disgust on an international scale, the daily violence, and reading new horrors every damn day is absolutely the greater of two evils, though. I can’t see a scenario where anything is worth what’s in store.

        Non voters aren’t the sole reason we’re here, but I’m sick of pretending that those people’s choices didn’t play a large role in our current situation. These times demand we all do some soul searching, take accountability, and work together to get out of this in one piece. Because, again, we have to live in the reality of where we’re at.

    • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Christian USA basically had to choose between the Antichist and your average capital-loving politician and they went “fuck it, I’ll vote for satan cause he said he I’ll make gas cheaper.”. And the pedo-guy still has a 40% approval rating at the current moment. This country is a lost cause.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yes it’s the individuals that are the problem not the party that chains to be left but sides right every single fucking time.

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Do you honestly think that if Harris won there would be armed agents on the street murdering citizens, driving your economy to historic lows, alienating your closest allies, tanking trade routes, invading Venezuela, kidnapping anyone with a skin colour darker than snow white…

        I could go on.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        So, who else to blame for voters that think Taco and Kamala are the same and that Taco would be “better for 'conomy”? That’s the fault of the Democratic Party?

        People keep blaming them for anything and everything and how they have to “message better”, but the Democrats don’t really have any kind of media to get that message out on.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          No one said that. But it’s inarguable that the Democratic party is in large part responsible for people not wanting to vote for the candidates they put forth knowing full well we want an actual lefty and not a corporate business monster.

    • 4grams@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I have someone like that in my life. To this day they think masking and “forced gene modifications” are a bigger deal than what happening now. I’ve been lectured so many times about how anger at what’s going on is just being political.

        • 4grams@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          She’s antivax, especially when it comes to the mRNA vaccines, she claims they are a government experiment that we were forced to undergo. She conveniently ignores that the phizer was available and you weren’t mandated unless you wanted access to public services.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Oh, good grief. One of those dead-enders. I find it hilarious when someone I know still holds a grudge about having to get the “jab” to travel, or to work, and so on. The biggest snowflakes.

    • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      200 NGOs Oppose Biden’s Historic Expansion of ICE Detention System: “Detention should not be about politics.”

      ICE records show Biden admin plans could give Trump a head start on deportations

      President Biden Signs Anti-Immigrant Spending Bill Reaching Trump-Era Highs

      Biden’s Emergency Funding Proposal Seeks $14 Billion for Immigration System From Congress

      Tom Homan - Border Czar was originally appointed by Obama

      Keep in mind, these democrat moves to bolster ICE were happening while the right was blatantly telegraphing their moves to immediately weaponize ICE once they took power. Project 2025 came out and promised to use ICE to plunder and abuse Americans. Biden and team then spent the next 4 years not only failing to prepare for Trump, but preemptively strengthening the mechanisms Trump would eventually use to carry out project 2025. The democrats are controlled opposition.

      Sure, maybe we wouldnt be seeing this intense of immigration enforcement if Kamala were in charge, but if she were, she’d be working behind the scenes to ensure the right had all the tools they needed when the time was right.

      The democrats are controlled opposition and the American electoral system is kabuki theater. The fascist descent is the only logical conclusion to the American political experiment- which was predicated on the wholesale genocide of Native American Indians and quickly pivoted to enslaving an entire continent.

      You realize what the only logical conclusion to your “pragmatic liberal utilitarianism” is, right? I give it 4 years before youre chiding leftists for not voting for dem candidate Ted Cruz as he campaigns against republican candidate Mecha Hitler. Youll still see nothing wrong with that. You will sell out the victims of American Imperialism to buy yourself 4 more years of political waffling - just as you did with Palestinians.

      • AlexLost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Immigration was a huge debate issue during that time and something just kept saying not enough was being done to combat a bunch of lies and made up stories. So yeah, they went all in an said “see” but gumball in chief just kept lying and swindling and y’all ate it up.

    • fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Your top dem wants trans people exterminated just like Trump. So where’s the FUCKING choice? If trump was a dem, you’d vote for him.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Ditto.

      Our first house was my late grandparents home. I bought it from my dad for 100k in 2013, which itself was probably ~25k below market.

      We sold it in 2018 for 250k, and bought our current home for 375k.

      Zestimate now for my house is 613k. I could never afford that. I paid what, a net 225k (plus taxes and interest ofc).

      I don’t discount how much luck has played into my current station in life…but damn.

      The downside is…I feel like I’m stuck here now. We refi’d when rates were near their lowest, and any house that would be a sidestep in quality/neighborhood/size costs the same or more, plus higher interest.

      My SIL and her new husband just bought a house and I damn near fainted when I heard what her mortgage is gonna be.

      I was already teetering on the edge when my BIL told me how much rent is for his 1BR apartment (which is also much more than my mortgage on my 4br/1.5ba house).