Roku is exploring ways to show consumers ads on its TVs even when they are not using its streaming platform: The company has been looking into injecting ads into the video feeds of third-party devices connected to its TVs, according to a recent patent filing.

This way, when an owner of a Roku TV takes a short break from playing a game on their Xbox, or streaming something on an Apple TV device connected to the TV set, Roku would use that break to show ads. Roku engineers have even explored ways to figure out what the consumer is doing with their TV-connected device in order to display relevant advertising.

  • RunningInRVA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    196
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine being the guy working on this and how much you hate yourself anytime somebody asks you what you are working on.

    • jg1i@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, I bet these guys don’t care. I used to work at a company you might have products from and I would constantly hear “Hey, we’re a business” as an excuse to degrade the user experience. :(

    • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember having an argument with my teacher in college about this. He asked us what we would do if we were asked to code something that could be used for things you personally don’t agree with such as the government using tools to “help” but also remove peoples privacy. Or corporations being able to show you more ads. I told him i would refuse. And he said that it would be my job though and sometimes you have to do things you don’t like. So i told him i would quit. And for some reason he could not really comprehend that and we got into an argument.

      • acr515@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, most people I know don’t have the financial flexibility to quit their job if they’re asked by their boss to do something objectionable

    • datelmd5sum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      We had to listen this C-level guy give a speech how good the last couple of years have been. We’ve increased the price of services by 50% and the amount of useless upsell shit we push to people has gone up as well. While our wages are still the same and people are getting laid off constantly. But I need food and shit.

      • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        I like that. If there was a site that did like The Razzies for movies but for technology enshitification, I would definitely watch, and probably follow a blog if it was done well

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Roku has always been a shitty company that wants to monetize everything. People are finally waking up. How many of us have a Roku remote that advertises a useless or bankrupt streaming service?

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know I’m old, but I miss having numbers on my remote.

        Now I have a “sling” and a “crackle” button. 🙁

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I do miss being able to quickly type a code to jump to a known broadcaster. Opening up a menu is slower than jumping direct to said thing.

          The Roku buttons solves that a little bit, but there is only 4, you can’t change them, and they prioritize featuring whoever pays up.

  • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    "People are taking the piss out of you everyday. They butt into your life, take a cheap shot at you and then disappear. They leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small. They make flippant comments from buses that imply you’re not sexy enough and that all the fun is happening somewhere else. They are on TV making your girlfriend feel inadequate. They have access to the most sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it. They are The Advertisers and they are laughing at you.

    You, however, are forbidden to touch them. Trademarks, intellectual property rights and copyright law mean advertisers can say what they like wherever they like with total impunity.

    removed that. Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours. It’s yours to take, re-arrange and re-use. You can do whatever you like with it. Asking for permission is like asking to keep a rock someone just threw at your head.

    You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially don’t owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don’t even start asking for theirs."

    – Banksy

  • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How the removed can an economy that’s almost nothing but advertisements sustain itself for any period of time? It feels like forcing more and more ads is the only thing anybody does for money anymore.

    • untorquer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Big economy, long time to fall. See example: rome or whatever.

      They’re not even going to profit so much off the ads as they will having a new way to distribute them. Even then its, “line go up this quarter”, not “what if sales go down due to this?”. They’ll license it out to every offer company who needs it for line go up.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait until someone invents a bot/AI script that watches ads for you. Then the whole “ads everywhere” will either implode or it’ll trigger a war between AI ad makers and AI ad watchers

      Either way, it’ll be entertaining.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They already have that it’s called click fraud or automated ad clicking, mostly though it’s websites that earned money from advertisers who engage in this, as a sleazy way of making more money.

        Though if you want to partake in it there are ad blocking extensions that also do it. It’s not perfect but it is quite damaging to the advertising industry.

  • InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    If Roku actually does this I would definitely never use them again. Completely asinine behavior. Especially because most people aren’t even using stand alone boxes with their smart TVs.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would get rid of my old Roku that I’m sure is too old for this tech and urge everyone I know to never buy anything Roku, and if they did, I would lambast them every opportunity I could.

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Our tv turned out to be a roku tv. When we bought it this wasn’t advertised well. Which feels on brand right now.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I will never buy a Roku device because of that forced arbitration stunt. We can add the fact that they are even considering this to the list of reasons.

      • Marleyinoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, Roku must be on its last legs with the crap they’re pulling. All of this says to me: don’t buy Roku.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems like so long that Roku was not a horrible company. Simple little box for a good price with a small static ad on the home screen to make money.

    Seems like a lifetime ago.

        • Jesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, just saying Roku is has been the worst offender of this. Other manufacturers restricted these promotional buttons to streaming services that have large user bases. Roku sells those buttons to anyone who pays enough, and their remotes famously feature services that people don’t care about.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    11 months ago

    Is this why they made people waive their right to sue them?

    Yeah… removed Roku.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, no. The waiver was because they lost millions of people personal data to hackers and scammers. Entirely different fuckup.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is gross. I cut my cable because of ads. Have about 3 types of adblockers on my computer to stop them. This hyper marketing is why so many have turned away from traditional entertainment to begin with.

    I am more than the ability to spend money and it’s goddamn time everyone say this and boycott companies that do shady garbage like this

    • danciestlobster@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have ubo, what are your other kinds of ad blocking? I always want to block as many ads as possible

      • JK_Flip_Flop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        I suspect they might be talking about a DNS based ad blocking solution. Like Pi-Hole or AdGaurd DNS.

        They work by blocking DNS requests made by ads so the content can never be accessed. They’re theoretically more powerful than browser extensions as they have the opportunity to block ads anywhere.

        • Kalysta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          While we have one (Pi-hole) I can’t use it right now because some of my roommate’s work software won’t run with it and we haven’t had time to troubleshoot. So I have a bunch of extensions in my browser on my pc

          • JK_Flip_Flop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            You could configure the DNS only on devices that don’t have issues with it rather than the network as a whole?

            • Opisek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              That, and you can also decide what (if anything) gets blocked on a per MAC/IP/FQDN basis, so you can explicitly allow ads for specific devices.

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Adblock plus, flashblock, ublock, and one that stops videos from autoplaying but i can’t remember it’s name right now.

        My roommate has raspberry pi but it messes with his’s wife’s work software so we never have it active. Which is a shame because i’d rather use that.

        Oh, and Brave browser on my phone. It’s lovely.

        • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The Pihole has groups that you can separate devices with and remove blocks for those devices.

          So you can have your stuff fully blocked and then her device can have the problematic blocks removed.

  • mortrek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Never connect your smart TV to the internet. Just don’t do it. Get a third party device or ideally use an old PC with an appropriate HTPC Linux distro or something.

    • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Wait, why? Is the TV spying on me any more than my phone, every app I use, my desktop OS, every website I visit, all of my smart home devices, my car, my bank, traffic cameras, and my bottom left molar?

      Can’t I just slap a PiHole on my home network and pretend I’ve done something about it?

      • PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        TVs have a history of listening and collecting a lot more data than a smart device.

        With a TV device like an android or Linux box, you can prevent that as well as ad-injection because you can install whatever you want on the device and it’s not as locked down as a TV. You can even disable or physically remove recording devices if you’d like, and many smart boxes do not even come with them.

        Also, a pihole does not guarantee you filtered out everything or prevented the TV from interfering with your experience.

        A TV can also change its policy on the fly and suddenly start injecting ads. Many TVs do this to add additional income after your purchase.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        If tv is talking home using ip directly, DNS blocking will not work. You have to ether disconnect tv from your network or give the tv a static ip and block all traffic to and from WAN (internet) from that device Update tv manually using USB stick.

        • mortrek@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Reply to old reply, sorry. Technically blocking the IP isn’t perfect either. In theory, as long as it has the wifi credentials, and your wifi has access to the internet, your TV will be able to access the internet if it really wants to. All it’d have to do is ignore the IP assignment or fake/change a MAC address during DHCP. I don’t know why a “legit” TV would do this, but if you get some unbranded Chinese thing, or if any wifi device wants to be malicious, it can bypass DHCP+IP filters very easily.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Get a signage TV instead of a smart TV. Then you also don’t have to deal with the slow ass UI.

  • net00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve never given money to roku, and now I’ll never will