• GooberEar@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This reminds me of the time when I was a kid and me and several of my family members went racing out into the front yard to watch the plane that was doing all kinds of aerial acrobatics over our neighbors’s field dropping whatever chemical or fertilizer was in their tanks that day so we were all basically coated in it by the time they were done and we went back inside. Except I wasn’t a kid when it happened, I was a fully informed adult who should have known better and then a few days later we found out it was some kind of potentially dangerous fungicide. But on the plus side I now have 3 penises.

    • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      This reminds me of my parents’ stories of running out to play in the clouds of DDT when the spray trucks went through the neighborhood

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I had my conspiracy theory ex brother in law explain that chem trails were things Biden added to jets to fight global warming… My response was “shit, I wish that was true!”

    Somehow that wasn’t the answer he was expecting.

  • vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I got back in touch with a friend of mine who who graduated in the same class as me with a B.S. in Physics. When they learned that I’m an atmospheric scientist, their first question was “What’s the deal with Chem trails?”

    Point being, conspiracy theories also infect the educated sometimes.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      Dude on my Facebook posted a Pic of some repurposed 747 with a bunch of tubes in the cabin with a caption about the chemtrail stuff taking up space. Like, motherfucker, if it takes that much space, how is every passenger jet doing it??

    • Michael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea-Spray

      From the page:

      Between 1949 and 1969, open-air tests of biological agents were conducted 239 times.

      239 open-air tests of biological agents in a 20 year period. Remind me again why people have no reason to be paranoid? This wasn’t that long ago.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

      These aren’t conspiracy theories.

      Is there something real behind these people’s paranoia and suspicion? Do our government, military, and our corporations inspire trust?

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Is there something real behind these people’s paranoia and suspicion? Do our government, military, and our corporations inspire trust?

        No, the US government, as with every government, does not deserve trust. They are not your friend. They will lie to you, directly or by omission.

        However, all governments are bad at coverups. Chem trails would need to have entire leagues and fields paid off and prohibited from investigating it. Not just in America, but world wide. If America was doing Chem trails, there’s nothing really prohibiting China or Russia from calling it out. They have zero reasons to agree to deals to limit their scientists, as it would be a major shake up in geopolitics. America in that instance could not be trusted with any claims of its scientific achievements.

        I don’t really buy into a moon landing hoax or a JFK cover up. By now, everything and everyone involved would have had to been paid off, including families, scientists, historians, and more.

        You don’t need to be mad at a vague shadow government, you can be mad at the actual government for what they are actually doing. Be mad at Tuskegee and Gulf of Tonkin, not 9/11 with wire bombs and plane holograms.

        • Michael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 minutes ago

          I’m not making an argument for chemtrails. It’s pointless to speculate about, there is no evidence or smoking gun.

          I’m just suggesting that we be kind and empathetic towards individuals that do believe these sorts of things. Is it out of character for the US government? Nah, not really.

          Many of these people probably were living in or around 1969. In their lived reality, the US government was doing shit like this. Have things really gotten better?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Understanding is cemented in one’s original source of information about the world. Shaping a pre-existing understand requires not just accuracy but volume, because you’re not competing against faulty logic. You’re competing against accumulated memories.

      If someone is deep into the conspiracy theory rabbit hole, what is shaping their opinion is the consistent repetition of orthodoxy over time. Similarly, if someone is highly educated in a particular scientific field, their opinion is shaped by the persistent need to reaffirm fundamental truths in order to succeed and progress. We are not computers. We are not creatures of pure logic. We are the accumulation of our prior experiences and exposures.

      You should not be surprised if an individual - when confronted with a narrow band of contrary information - does not immediately jettison all their prior information. Because ask yourself - would you? I mean, if a single guy showed up with a stack of papers insisting he’s proved without a shadow of a doubt that chemtrails are real and the entire professional weather reporting community is lying to you, is there anything they could show you that you wouldn’t greet with skepticism proportional to your exposure to professional weather science?

      Because, if the answer is “No”, then why would you expect someone immersed in hundreds of hours of conspiracy theory podcasts and think pieces and social media conversations to behave any differently?

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I literally put it together in highschool when someone mentioned it to me after learning about how clouds form from nuclei.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Meanwhile space x makes a flare and has falling debris , MAGA: gotta buy a cybertruck and drive it into ocean to show support

  • hansolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    “It’s chemicals!”

    “It’s spider webs of chemicals!”

    “It’s microchips!”

    “It’s sun blocking special metallic smoke!”

    “It’s cancer seeds!”

    • My Mom, an expert on chemtrails
        • Doolbs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I know people who believe all the BS about the chemtrails, and I have started telling them that yes, those are chemtrails.

          And, like a good person I tell that it is Dihydrogen Monoxide.

          Then we go from there.

      • hansolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Well, and “it causes cancer” is as well. But not like… It’s raining down cancer on you. More like jet fuel contains known carcinogens.

        It’s more the direct effects. According to my mom, the chemtrails should have…I don’t know, but done whatever it was supposed to be doing by now. A 30+ year timeline for something causing cancer? So less bad than smoking? That’s the metric?

        • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          At least some nutters have the decency to say that it’s mind controlling chemicals, not the “you’ll be dead soon” kind.

          Kind of like the covid vaccine. I should have been dead in 3 6 8 months a year 2 years 3 years 4 years I’ll be dead in 5 years!

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Do they say what purpisebtheyee being mind controlled? How about the impracticality of mind controlling millions of random people with no special access or skills, and you’re not even there to tell them what to do?

            Can’t we at least inject some logic into the chemtrails conspiracy, like it’s a mild sedative to keep you from worry what they’re doing and to keep you from standing up for your rights?

            All those second amendment types talk about how they would repel an unjust government, but they never actually do. It must be the chrmtrsils making them docile

    • Deme@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The fourth one of those is unfortunately an almost plausible theory. Plenty of people are seriously advocating for studies into Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) in order to mitigate climate change so that the almighty free market would have more time to fix the problem without any need for systemic change.

      But that wouldn’t be visible to the naked eye :D

      Funnily enough, contrails like all other clouds composed of ice crystals actually warm the planet up by letting shortwave radiation from the sun through while reflecting longwave (infrared), effectively trapping heat. Thcker and lower clouds are more effective at reflecting shortwave radiation.

      • hansolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes, but the conspiracy theory version is that it’s a scam to further the scam that is climate change. It doesn’t make any sense.

  • Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 hours ago

    On the other hand, we have seen exhaust being very efficient in distributing chemicals with adverse health effects across the planet. Leaded gasoline was a huge oopsie that still has adverse health effects today.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Does it still cause harm? Or are people “just” still harmed by the exposure back then?

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        General aviation still uses leaded gas almost exclusively. It’s really hard to qualify replacements though the FAA, and airports don’t want to carry multiple fuel types.

      • Thorry84@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I think it has gotten a lot better in the past 10 years, but there are still a lot of places where there is too much lead in the environment. It doesn’t degrade at all, so unless it’s dealt with it just stays there. Given we’ve only gotten rid of leaded gasoline less then 3 decades ago, the effects are still very much there.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I’ve read that most of the lead from leaded gasoline is still in the environment, where it does cause harm. It it’s in the soil, and that can get into people through a variety of means.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I don’t know if it’s universal but here every kid is tested for lead. When we did that, our pediatrician warned not to grow vegetables within 10’ of the house.

          For any house in the us built before mid 1970s you most likely had lead exterior paint Which would contaminate the soil. However they weren’t concerned about it still being concentrated enough to harm people directly, only if you ate contaminated vegetables

          The lead will never go away, but it does disperse, mix in, get covered over time

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    When I read /r/teachers and all the trouble they’re having teaching the next generation, this is the sort of thing I imagine is coming. A couple of years ago, GenZ was saying, in essence, “We just need to wait for all the ‘boomers’ to die off, then everything will be better.” No. No, that will just make things worse. GenX leftists are the only ones holding the line, and Millennial teachers are about to give up and walk away, seriously. It’s pretty fuckin’ bad, and it’s clear it’s going to get worse, looking at how many kids are coming up through the school system who can barely read and write and have practically zero attention span or motivation.

    • icosahedron@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Hi there, gen Z person here. Things are bad but remember that, as always, you only see and hear about the vocal minority. No matter how poor American education standards are, it is irrefutable that Trumpism could not exist without idiots from all generations. The education paradigms we are emerging from cannot possibly be worse than those which produced tens of millions of conservatives and hundreds of millions of nonvoters. This is specifically because of those gen X leftists and millennial teachers you mentioned. We aren’t competing as generations–failures of the past become the lessons of the present because older generations also have smart people. So how do you know gen Z won’t do even better? Everything else aside, growing up under fascism creates widespread discontent. I’d say from personal knowledge that for every one gen Z kid that believes in the system are five who at least recognize it’s broken.

      Now, I won’t pretend to be particularly optimistic either; things are bad. However, I also want to believe that we can and will do better. And maybe I’ll be wrong, but at least I haven’t given up hope.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        A lot of us realized the futility of the current system and put our hopes on gen z to be better, to rebuild, to have the sense to build the future, not tear it down. For there to be a huge change when the boomers finally give it up.

        Unfortunately this election showed gen z to be just as flawed as the rest of us. It’s getting harder to hope but maybe my kids will help save the world

  • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Here’s a new clearer statement to express my thoughts on the matter.

    Contrails are visible and normal and fine. I probably don’t fully understand the science behind them, but I realize what we are seeing is water vapor.

    Chemtrails are also real though. They are invisible to the naked eye and are directly contributing to global warming as well as some health concerns that are hard to quantify. They are not some conspiracy to control or disable the masses. The exhaust of cars and especially planes leave a trail of harmful chemicals behind them. The reason for this is because we care more about convenience and money than we do about the ecosystem we live in.

    I personally believe pointing out that dichotomy is more useful than laughing at people who are misinformed.

    • mhague@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Contrails are assholes. They are too thin to reflect sunlight, but they soak up and trap heat. They form a blanket and contribute a ton to global warming.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      that’s not a workable strategy because when you redefine terms like that you sound just like a conspiracy theorist. exhaust gases are not “chemtrails”, they’re exhaust gases. they’re dangerous and everywhere, but they’re not a secret government conspiracy.

      we don’t need a “new way” to talk about things with people who refuse to understand.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If you loosely define chemtrails as “a trail of chemicals” then almost everything has chemtrails. Fuckkin ants have chemtrails, it’s how they communicate and navigate.

        Chemtrail conspiracists literally think that airplanes are full of 55 gallon drums of chemicals with the express purpose to harm or feminize the populace to prevent people from opposing the government.

    • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Chemtrails are broadly believed to be nefarious chemicals that alter everything from weather (to facilitate global warming, not to prevent it) to human/animal hormones. While exhaust is no doubt harmful, when conspiracy theorists speak of chemtrails, they are speaking of shady government operatives intentionally loading the planes with experimental chemicals that are meant to be rained down onto the masses.

      • Michael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Can you blame them when the US government has directly experimented on the American populace in past?

        e.g. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea-Spray

        From the page:

        Between 1949 and 1969, open-air tests of biological agents were conducted 239 times.

        239 open-air tests of biological agents in a 20 year period. Many, many people are still alive from that time period. It’s not that long ago.

        Or more broadly, just look at this page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

        Do those pages inspire trust in the government and military? Would you know if you were being experimented on and gaslit?

        Corporations engage in similar unethical behavior, like putting ingredients that are known to be toxic or harmful to human health in products we consume or put on our bodies.

        Instead of blaming or name-calling people who are paranoid or suspicious, we need a society with a greater focus on human rights — with more regulation and oversight. A society that inspires trust, with the facts, ethics, and independent review to back it up.

        • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Instead of blaming or name-calling people who are paranoid or suspicious

          You’re leaving out the massively important fact that a basic science fact that one can experiment and experience themselves on a cool morning is enough to destroy these idiots. If your world view is that fragile then you deserve all mockery you get for holding it continually

          • Michael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Why go out of your way to disprove them, laugh at them, or name-call them? You can just empathize with them.

            For me, I’d rather address why the government HAS felt it had the right to experiment on us. I can NOT blame these individuals for treading into delusion with our current system being the way it is, especially considering the history.

            • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Why go out of your way to disprove them, laugh at them, or name-call them

              They’re willingly living in stupidity. If we just let people do that we get people like Trump, so Id rather avoid that

              I can NOT blame these individuals for treading into delusion

              Neither can I, but as I said you’re purposefully ignoring a big part of what’s being discussed: the part where they don’t ever tread back out of delusion. There’s 0 defense for that

              • Michael@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                The Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee called for using far-right candidates “as a cudgel to move the more established candidates further to the right.” Clinton’s camp insisted that Trump and other extremists should be “elevated” to “leaders of the pack” and media outlets should be told to “take them seriously.”

                Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and mainstream media played a pretty big role in Trump’s rise to power. Everybody is responsible for his rise to power, but the facts are facts. They intentionally elevated him.

              • Michael@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                They’re willingly living in stupidity. If we just let people do that we get people like Trump, so Id rather avoid that

                These people don’t have power over others like Trump.

                Neither can I, but as I said you’re purposefully ignoring a big part of what’s being discussed: the part where they don’t ever tread back out of delusion. There’s 0 defense for that

                You aren’t responsible for other’s beliefs. You are loosely reveling in their suffering, whether you realize it or not. They are very concerned and are likely vulnerable individuals.

                Plenty of things happen in this world that each respective populace doesn’t consent to.

                Seriously, why single them out for going a little crazy? It’s not like I haven’t pointed at somebody and laughed in the past, so no judgement here, but the whole system and world order is nuts and we need something new.

                If you are worried about people holding factually incorrect or wrong beliefs, e.g. delusions, then advocate for decentralized media, unbiased news organizations, etc. Help elevate voices that help others to climb out of their delusions and fear.

                • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  These people don’t have power over others like Trump.

                  These are the people voting Trump in, dude, you cant actually be this dense

                  You aren’t responsible for other’s beliefs

                  No, but I do try to make the world a less stupid place when I can

                  You are loosely reveling in their suffering, whether you realize it or not.

                  If they’re too stupid to learn basic science then I reeeeally don’t care

                  They are very concerned and are likely vulnerable individuals.

                  Ok? They’re also very stupid individuals, I don’t care at all what makes them believe the blatantly stupid thing, only that they refuse to accept reality

                  Seriously, why single them out for going a little crazy?

                  Because it’s a very obvious and easy one to point out. There are posts about other delusions all the time, this one just happened to be about these specific people

                  If you are worried about people holding factually incorrect or wrong beliefs, e.g. delusions, then advocate for decentralized media, unbiased news organizations, etc.

                  I also do this. Weird of you to assume that someone on Lemmy doesn’t just because they also don’t respect people who refuse to think

                  You’re doing an awful lot of defending of people who are choosing to behave the way they do, it’s weird. Gonna file you in with them and call it a day, you don’t seem to be too far from them in the ol’ comprehension skill